Monday, July 6, 2015

Firefighter Suspended For Flying The Confederate Flag

Political correctness has officially run amok...






(WCCO) A small-town Minnesota firefighter has stirred up a firestorm by flying the Confederate flag at an Independence Day parade.

Brian Nielsen is a volunteer firefighter in the town of Hartland. He said he was demonstrating against political correctness when he flew the flag at Friday’s parade in Albert Lea. But as Nina Moini reports, he got a stronger reaction than he ever expected.

He’s used to putting out fires, not starting them.

"I take full responsibility for what I did," Nielsen said.

Volunteer firefighter Brian Nielsen says he didn’t mean to offend anyone when he attached a Confederate flag onto a city of Hartland fire truck during this past Friday’s parade in nearby Albert Lea...

Read The Full Story

23 comments:

  1. This is what the National Review said about Sheriff Joe:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

    BTW, Obama's birth on US soil---in Hawaii---has been proven by: (1) his Hawaii birth certificate; (2) the repeated confirmation of their sending it to Obama and all the facts on it being the same as what they sent by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii; (3) the public Index Data file; (4) the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the papers, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii); (5) the Hawaii teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after hearing of the birth of a child to a woman NAMED STANLEY from the head of obstetrics at Kapiolani Hospital; (6) the INS inspector who checked on Obama's father's residence status and wrote: "They have one child, born in HONOLULU."

    Here is a link to many (though far from all) of the documents that confirm that Hawaii sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that all the facts on the copies published are exactly the same as on what they sent to him:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Just a slight problem in that the name of the hospital on the Certificate did not exist as such at the alleged time of his birth. It came into being a number of years later as a result of a merger between two hospitals that had previously been independent of each other.. I'm sure there is a reasonable explanation for this but I have not yet heard it. Perhaps you know?

    ReplyDelete
  3. all of the congress has known the truth from the beginning

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe to your disappointment the National Review is repeating the liberal argument of why Obama is a US citizen. The National Revue is slowly becoming a liberal rag. The Constitution requires that a person is a natural born citizen. It's funny how McCain was but under such scrutiny was placed on him to prove that he was a natural born citizen, yet there was none about Obama's birth. McCain was born in Panama at a military hospital, which is considered American soil. An important stipulation about being a Natural Born citizen is that both parents are Americans, either by birth or were naturalized citizens for five years. Obama's father was a British subject and was never an American citizen, which was supposed to automatically disqualify him.
    Your point #1: Both birth certificates are fakes, as well as, his Social Security Number and Selective Service card. There is about 45 pages of evidence, step by step, of how they proved it. Remember that the short form was what was first produced and when questioned about the long form, the WH said the long form didn't exist. It was supposed to have been destroyed, yet when Trump questioned the short form being legitimate and valid, it suddenly appeared.
    Point #2: There hasn't been information confirmed in Hawaii by both parties that the birth certificate exists. Governor Abercrombie stated he was going to verify the document existed. He failed. The governor should have been able to see any document he wants in that state. He was refused access. The only time both parties got to look at the document, they were shown the unverified document and weren't allowed to verify its authenticity.
    Point #3: The index number at the top of the document doesn't fit in the existing records. There were twins born the same day and Obama's time of birth was between the two, yet his number is a few hundred off from the sequence. There weren't that many children born to get the numbers that mixed up.
    Point #4: All births that are supposed to be in Hawaii are put in the papers. The Cold Case Posse found that there were a number of births that have been staged. For a few thousand dollars, anyone could have their birth certificates listed in Hawaii at that time. They found that there have been a few thousand people, especially born in Japan, have had illegal birth certificates from Hawaii by the same method as Obama. They have found there were several corrupt politicians doing this practice.
    Point #5: As far as the letter is concerned, if you read the newspaper, you saw the announcement.
    Point #6: There is documentation that state that Obama's parents never actually lived together. Giving Obama his name was a convenience trade off. Father Obama didn't want to be deported, so Stanley gave him the opportunity to stay he was the father and stay in the country. Records were gone through about travel with visas, at that time. All of these records were on micro film. When records were looked up on the particular time frame Obama's mother was supposed to have given birth, those records were gone. If she had traveled to and from Kenya at that time, records have suspiciously gone missing. all the others at that time are still there.
    It doesn't matter about the link. If there was that much money exchanged to make these forgeries, of course they would send documents. If they didn't and someone would complain, there would have been a federal investigation of corruption by the FBI. If this comes to trial, there will be your side of the argument as the defense and my side will be the prosecution's arguments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ARREST and TRY this FRAUD ILLEGAL TREASONOUS KENYA MUZZY FRAUD b

    ReplyDelete
  6. BULLSHIT . HE , ( OBOGUS ) Hasn't proved ANYTHING . He IS an ILLEGAL FRAUD TREASONOUS LIB/DEM COMMIE KENYA MUZZY . You IDIOTIC MORON

    ReplyDelete
  7. Plus KENYA MUZZY OBOGUS , Was ADOPTED by a INDO CITIZEN . His Mammies Husband . That alone makes him , ILLEGAL

    ReplyDelete
  8. You've got Exactly , Right on the Money . The Only reason , they wont allow , or Admit . Barry , IS a FRAUD ILLEGAL TREASONOUS POTUS , is Fear of Nation Wide RACE RIOTS , for da Blacks losing their FRAUD PHONY MESSIAH . Period . Hell . I say , LET'EM RIOT . They NEED Thinned out

    ReplyDelete
  9. Re "the name of the hospital...did not exist."

    THAT is according to BIRTHER research, and it is wrong. WRONG. (What gave you the notion that birther research would be right?)

    Don't believe me? Here is the telephone number of the hospital: (808) 983-6000. Call that number, ask for the PR Department, and then ASK what the full name of that hospital was in 1961 and compare what they tell you with what is on Obama's birth certificate.



    (BTW the reason for the mistake in the birther research is that two OTHER hospitals with the name Kapiolani merged. That is because, duh, Queen Kapiloani founded A LOT OF HOSPITALS. Birther "researchers" noted that two of them merged----but those two were NOT the Kapiolani where Obama was born.)


    Please tell us why do you believe BIRTHER research?

    ReplyDelete
  10. IF you'd do a little critical thinking, you'd realize how stupid the claim that Obama was not born in Hawaii (particularly the "born in Kenya" side of it) really is.


    For Obama to have been born in a foreign country: (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman,and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being perfectly fine hospitals in Hawaii; (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist); (3) Obama’s relatives would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie about writing that letter (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).


    (Oh, and there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying.)


    And it take an absence of critical thinking to believe that BIRTHER "experts" are telling the truth about Obama's birth certificate being forged when birther sites lied about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said in THREE interviews and when they ran three forged "Kenyan birth certificates"----and, to pick one more example, a forged "Columbia University student ID" that claims to show that Obama was registered as a foreign student, when Columbia U. has never issued a student ID card that identifies foreign students any differently than US students (and if you don't believe me, you can call them up yourself and ask for the PR department and ASK).


    In short Obama really was born in Hawaii, and it takes a lack of thinking to even think that there was a rational CHANCE that he was born anywhere else-----particularly in Kenya (where the Kenyan government has said that he was NOT born, and where only 21 people came from in the year Obama was born-----all but one of whom came by SHIP, and there were no regular ships from Kenya to Hawaii or vice versa).

    ReplyDelete
  11. Actually, Obama really was born in Hawaii as his birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers (and ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii) all show. Those facts, BTW, are why Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and Gingrich and Santorum and Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck and the National Review have all said that they do not believe the birther claims.

    ReplyDelete
  12. BIRTHERS naturally claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged---for obvious motives. And they did not tell you (for the same motives) that millions of people have errors in their SS numbers caused mainly by data entry errors and that simply by entering a zip code wrong in the data entry would generate a SS number from another place (I wonder why they did not tell you that?)

    Worse, they did not tell you a small but important FACT: Obama did not have his selective service card put online, a BIRTHER put it online. That birther CLAIMS to have gotten it from the Selective Services Administration---but even if that is true, the birther had the chance to fool around with the image of the card before putting it online to make it look forged.

    (Now, what do you suppose the MOTIVE of birther sites would be not to tell you that simple fact and to assume that Obama must have forged his selective service card----when, since he did not have it put online, he could not have done so. What was the motive?)

    The same motive that caused birthers to claim that Kapiolani Hospital had a different name from on Obama's birth certificate in 1961---but a simple telephone call to the hospital today will show anyone who calls that the name really was the same as on Obama's birth certificate. And the same motive that caused birther sites to claim that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya-----when she really said that he was born IN HAWAII in three interviews (of which birther sites showed only part of one, carefully cutting off the tape recordings on their sites just before she was asked where he was born and replied: "in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.").

    And the same motive behind that lie caused birther sites NOT to show all the real document experts who said that there is nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate (now I wonder why birther sites would not show that?) and to lie about the claim that a complex document scanned and compressed and put into PDF----and then the PDF file opened in Adobe Illustrator would not show layers. The truth is that it would show layers and that layers are normal.

    Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

    And Sheriff Joe is one of the liars:

    http://www.nationalreview.com/article/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

    ReplyDelete
  13. Re: "he Cold Case Posse found that there were a number of births that have been staged. For a few thousand dollars, anyone could have their birth certificates listed in Hawaii at that time..."


    That is what the Cold Case Posse SAID---but, guess what, it never showed one single example. Not one---now I wonder why not?


    And both the DOH and the newspapers have confirmed that ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the Hawaii newspapers---and that the DOH only sent those notices for births IN HAWAII.


    Although the National Review may be somewhat to the left of your political views, the notion that it would LIE about Obama's place of birth----along with Ann Coulter and Glenn Beck and Romney and the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties (including the former Republican governor, a strong supporter of Sarah Palin's)----in order to help Obama, is totally loony.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Remember state laws got changed in HAWAII OVER THE ATTEMPT BY HIS GRANDMOTHER TO GETTHE BIRTH RECORDED THERE WHEN IT WAS DONEIN Topeka Ks WHERE HEWAS BORN. I WANT JUSTICE FOR THE THREE DEAD AT THE HANDS OF OTHERS...... WHAT IS THE PIRPOSE OF THE BIRTHERS? NOT THE TRUTH OR THEY WOULD HAVE GONE TO TOPEKA A LONG TIME AGO YET THEY AVOID IT LIKE THE TURTH WOULD BE THEN END OF THEIR DONATIONS.../? yet they lose court case after court case, as they forget in civil court they have to prove every thing and the best proof is the real documentation from TOPEKA KS. SO WHAT KIND OF AGENDA DOES THE BIG MONEY BEHIND THE BIRTHER MOVEMENT REALLY HAVE ? A DISTRACTION FROM SOME HORRENDOUS POLITICAL THINGS GOING ON THAT HARMS EVERYONE. THE FEW WHO DO SEKK THE TRUTH ARE GREATLY APPRIECIATED, BUT THEIR ARE TROLLS OUT THERE TO STOP EYE WITNESSES FROM COMING FORWARD. THEY HAVE BEEN VERY SUCESSFUL AS few eyewitnesses have come forward and 'everyone' in Topeka knew back then and few would wish to be treated so badly for just speaking the truth. LINDA JOY ADAMS

    ReplyDelete
  15. IF he were born in Topeka KS, he would be just as much an American citizen as being born in Hawaii----and vice versa. So for Constitutional purposes it does not matter which of the two places he was born. And only the place of birth affects Natural Born Citizen status (except for the children of foreign diplomats and members of invading enemy armies)---so birth either in Kansas or Hawaii is sufficient.

    Now, as for you being an eye witness. Unless there is a birth certificate from Kansas---sorry, your claim will get nowhere. The birth certificate from Hawaii and the confirmation of it by the officials of BOTH parties and the Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 and stored on two separate microfilm rolls in two separate Hawaii libraries are the facts that count.

    Here is a link to many (though far from all) of the documents that confirm that Hawaii sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that all the facts on the copies published are exactly the same as on what they sent to him---that the facts MATCH (notice that word):

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org...

    Here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican (who was a strong supporter of Sarah Palin), that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital:

    http://voices.washingtonpost.c...

    Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961.

    http://whatreallyhappened.com/...

    (And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

    And now, for the "he was born in Kenya" nuts:

    Here is the Kenyan Embassy statement that Obama WAS NOT BORN IN KENYA:

    http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged …

    And:

    Here is the US Immigration and Naturalization Service report for the year Obama was born:

    http://archive.org/stream/annualreportofim1962uni...

    Scroll down to page 74, about two-thirds of the way down in the book, and you will find the Kenya arrivals listing—there were only 21 arrivals.

    On page 77, the same report shows the number of people who WENT to Kenya in fiscal 1961, and that shows that only 63 did (of whom 60 were Americans), and that of the 63 not a single person, not one, went by air. They ALL went by ship.

    So, according to birther theory, Obama’s mother, in the last two months of pregnancy at the age of 18, was among the 60 Americans who went to Kenya by sea in that year and one of the seven Americans who came to the USA from Kenya in that year, and again she traveled by sea (since no Americans came to the USA from Kenya by air).

    There were, by the way, no normally scheduled direct ships from Kenya to Hawaii in 1961.


    Finally, the last thing the "born in Kenya" nuts usually say is "Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that she was there when he was born in Kenya." The answer is that she never said that at all; birther sites made it up completely.



    In fact, she said that he was born IN HAWAII in three different interviews, of which birther sites showed their readers only part of one (now, I wonder why they did not show their readers the other two at all???), and in the one that they did post, they cut off the tape recordings on their sites just before she was asked where he was born and replied: "In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time"----now, I wonder why birther sites would do that?

    ReplyDelete
  16. Obama was never adopted, which takes the action of a district court in Indonesia----and no such court papers have ever been found. And he was never an Indonesian citizen, as a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy will confirm: (202) 775-5200 ---- ask for the press officer.


    (The birther claim that "you had to be an Indonesian citizen to attend school in Indonesia is also false, and the same telephone call can confirm that fact too.)

    ReplyDelete
  17. Re: "Obama's father was a British subject and was never an American citizen, which was supposed to automatically disqualify him."

    Answer" But, of course, it doesn't. (If it did, don't you think that Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan and Karl Rove and the Republican Party would have protested Obama's being sworn in?)

    The "you gotta have two citizen parents (or even one)" myth comes from the same motive as the "he was born in Kenya" LIE. Neither are true. Birth on US soil is sufficient for Natural Born Citizen status, and the facts are overwhelming that Obama was born on US soil.


    “What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the
    United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”
    (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin
    G. Hatch (R-UT).


    “Under the longstanding English common-law
    principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the
    sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are
    citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States
    are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less
    certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States
    citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President
    ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION
    (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the
    Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

    "Some
    birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by
    birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born”
    citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion,
    which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in
    meaning."---The Wall Street Journal
    (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett)

    "Every
    child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen
    except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham
    (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)

    More reading on the subject:

    http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/

    http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012

    http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/

    http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/scotus-natural-born-citizen-a-compendium.html

    ReplyDelete
  18. The fake long form birth certificate is riddled with a variety of computer fonts of the same letter and computer kerning...There would have to been a magic typewriter there in Hawaii during the time Obama was born that used computer fonts.

    Obama's father has never been a US citizen so therefore Obama was not born of US citizens, so is not eligible...His father is a British Subject which gives Barry dual citizenship;...Do you think our founders would have written Article Two Section One Clause Five to include dual citizens when the main purpose was to exclude anyone that did not have undivided allegiance to our country.....afterbirths can not use common sense, their long drawn out spins are meant to bore you into submission....No need to read them they will try to quote British Common Law which makes everyone a subject to the government, and to the KING....Jon Jay was the author of the eligibility clause and he used the only literature that directly uses the phrase "Natural Born Citizen"...The Law of Nations.

    ReplyDelete
  19. well then based on this BS - it looks like and there is proof that Cruz is not eligible at all.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Re: "The fake long form birth certificate is riddled with a variety of
    computer fonts of the same letter and computer kerning...There would
    have to been a magic typewriter there in Hawaii during the time Obama
    was born that used computer fonts."

    Answer: That is what birthers say over and over and over for their own obvious motives. None of it is true. There is no "kerning." There are no unusual fonts or more fonts or different fonts. There is no "magic typewriter."

    Obama's birth certificate is not forged. IF birthers were really convinced that Obama's birth certificate really were forged and not just hoping to trick people into thinking that Obama was not eligible to be president, they would have:

    (1) shown ALL the confirmations of the facts on Obama's birth certificate by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii that ALL the facts on Obama's birth certificate are exactly the same as on what they sent to him; (2) shown ALL of the real experts who say that Obama's birth certificate is NOT forged; (3) admitted that layers are normal when a complex document is scanned, compressed, and put into PDF----and then the PDF file is opened in Adobe Illustrator; (4) answered this:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

    Re: "Obama's father has never been a US citizen so therefore Obama was not
    born of US citizens, so is not eligible...His father is a British
    Subject which gives Barry dual citizenship;...Do you think our founders
    would have written Article Two Section One Clause Five to include dual
    citizens...."

    Answer: Yes, in fact they did. The meaning of Natural Born Citizen comes from the common law in which every child born on the soil of the country is Natural Born----and that is regardless of the citizenship of the parents (except for the children of foreign diplomats and members of an invading army) and it is regardless of dual citizenship.

    Don't believe me? Well this is what the HERITAGE FOUNDATION book on the Constitution says:


    “Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus
    soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than
    children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth.
    Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born
    citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is
    whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born
    citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al,
    THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald
    Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known
    Conservative organization.]

    In short, the evidence that Obama was born on US soil---in Hawaii---is OVERWHELMING (there isn't even a hint of his mother even having a PASSPORT in 1961----and at the time very very few 18-year-olds did. And it would have been even more rare, EXTREMELY rare, for her to have traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy (and earlier would not have been possible due to the college schedule) because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birthers hope that GULLIBLE people will just assume that both of those highly unlikely things happened AND that Obama's Hawaii birth certificate is forged AND that the officials of both parties and the Index Data and the 1961 Hawaii newspaper birth notices are all lying.

    So Obama really was born on US soil, and the claims that his birth certificate are forged are really birther LIES, and every child born on US soil really is a Natural Born US citizen except for the children of foreign diplomats and the children of members of an invading army.

    John Jay, BTW, was AN EXPERT IN THE COMMON LAW---and if he had switched from the common law to "the Law of Nations," he would have said so---but he didn't.

    ReplyDelete
  21. MAYBE Cruz is not eligible, since he was born in Canada. But Rubio and Jindal and, yes, Obama, were all born on US soil and hence all of them are eligible. (And Obama's birth on US soil had been proven overwhelmingly---see below.)

    ReplyDelete
  22. What is the difference then between the "natural born citizen" than the "citizen" as used in the eligibility clause...Article 2 Section 1 Clause 5 of the Constitution?

    You are right by saying Obama is a citizen, due to he was NOT born of two citizen parents, so that makes him only a citizen and not a natural born citizen...Citizens are no longer eligible due to they were grandfathered in the eligibility clause.....Only citizens that were alive at the time of the adoption of the Constitution were eligible...they are all long been dead now so only the natural born citizen is eligible....So answer the question,

    ReplyDelete
  23. Hint, you can find the definition of a citizen in the 14th amendment...The natural born citizen can only be found in the Law of Nations.

    ReplyDelete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche