Sunday, October 12, 2014

Shocking New Evidence That Obama's 'Birth Certificate' Is Forged

And no, this is not something that you've heard before... it's new and it's breaking...




In a nutshell. The security background on the alleged long form birth certificate that Obama released is the wrong size.

Document expert Paul Irey just penned an open letter about the findings: "You know I hate liars and I hate to hold back evidence as others have done. I am sending you this important evidence that Doug Vogt and I determined yesterday to be a fact."

"Obama's birth certificate shows us a security paper background that is too small compared to other Hawaiian certificates of the era.

"Not wanting to hold back for even one day ... evidence that should concern us all ... I am giving you all a preview of what will soon be completed and testified to in a court of law in Brooklyn, NY next month when I will fly back into the U.S. for just that purpose and then return."

Preview: Document Experts Release New Evidence Confirming Obama Birth Certificate Forgery - 10/11/2014

16 comments:

  1. only brain dead scycophants and kool aid drinkers would continue to follow their FALSE PROPHET; BUT THAT IS "52%" of Americans today.. we intelligent knowledgeable engaged citizens must just observe the idiocy and wonder how it ever got to this point;;WE WENT TO SLEEP,,to much comfort and personal success made us ignore the obvious.regulus30 here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would also like to know how and when the constitution was changed to make the president Commander in Chief.According to the US constitution congress is in command until a declared war.The president is not the commander unless war is declared.It is in the constitution..Check it out.

      Delete
    2. The explanation is simple. Neither Obama's short form nor long form birth is "of the era." Both of them are modern official copies on modern security paper---as they both are supposed to be. The short form was created and sent to Obama by the DOH of Hawaii in 2007, and the long form BC was sent to Obama by the DOH of Hawaii in April 2011.

      Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year, and, BTW, he showed it way back in June 2008, five months before the election), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC.

      And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. The fact that Hawaii issued a birth certificate for Obama in 1961 (when Hawaii was not allowed by its law to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii) is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notice in the “Health Bureau Statistics” section of the newspapers (which ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to) and by the INS inspector who checked on Obama’s father’s status and wrote: “one child, born in Honolulu”---and by the Hawaii teacher who wrote home about Stanley having a baby.


      And there is no indication whatever that Obama’s mother even had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy. Yet birthers hope a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that both of those happened and that Obama’s birth certificate is forged and that the officials of both parties are lying, and that the Index Data and the birth notices are forged, and that the INS inspector made an error in his “one child, born in Honolulu” note, and that the teacher who wrote home was lying. But you’d have to be terribly GULLIBLE to think that all of that happened.

      Delete
  2. It means that the American people have duped. Forging certificates for any purpose, especially for an office such as the Presidnet of the United States, is a treasonable offense and explains many of the things that have been having in this country.
    This is a crime that has to be acted upon immediately by the people of this country. Have we lsot our minds and pride completely?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Did you know congress is trying to get this idiot a third term??????

      Delete
    2. Only the present senate, not the house, except the Dems in the house.

      Delete
  3. Any judge that refuses to consider this to be proof positive of forgery should be hanged alongside "o"boy and his enablers.

    ReplyDelete
  4. So who really cares? The people (conservatives elected) failed to do anything. I'm tired of this message as it is TOO LATE. The "koolaide" has been consumed by a perishing people.

    ReplyDelete
  5. What we need is a judge with guts to order HI to show to an official of an outside court exactly what HI has on file proving O born there. A b/cert or a claim made later? Unfortunately judges to date have dodged the issue by saying no plaintiff has standing. In effect, the people have no standing and plantiffs charged with bringing frivolous claims by activist pro-Obama judges

    ReplyDelete
  6. so when are the Generals and Admirals going to take action and roust this pretender to the presidency...there is a whole lot of stuff to be unraveled ....Harry Brown would take at least till 1 O'clock if sworn in by 10 A.M....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dream on. The facts are shown above.

      Delete
  7. Over and over and over we are told his birth certificate is no good. But yet no one is doing anything to get him out of office on the BC crime. Yes it is a crime and still if you called him today, he would answer the phone. Why? How much longer do we have to hear this nonsense? I think we are being lied to about this BC.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The reason is, of course, that what you have been told is false and that Obama's birth certificate is just fine.

      With the single exception of Reed Hayes, who has not proven his expertise in examining digital documents (he is a specialist in documents on paper, and he has not seen the paper copies) and who admits he has not seen the research on the way that the Xerox WorkCentre works, ONLY birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged. And they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

      One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

      Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

      And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

      Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

      Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

      Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

      Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

      Delete
    2. For those who have been relying on the "investigation" conducted by Sheriff Joe, Zullo and the Cold Case Posse:


      https://rcradioblog.wordpress.com/2014/10/31/was-the-ccp-birth-certificate-investigation-pay-to-play/

      http://www.wfsb.com/story/27170194/birther-posse-chief-i-accepted-10000-gift-from-source

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2014/09/arpaio-had-no-evidence-former-deputy-chief-says/

      http://blogs.phoenixnewtimes.com/valleyfever/2013/08/joe_arpaios_sham_investigation.php



      Oh, and this is what the National Review has been saying about Sheriff Joe for YEARS.

      http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/292780/conspiracy-again-editors

      Delete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche