Since for about six months we were told that "universe shattering" information would be announced by March, and it is now May, how much "sooner" is this promise of "sooner rather than later"? And now we are getting information about the Cold Case Posse from its former members:http://nativeborncitizen.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/brian-reilly-spilling-the-beans-on-zullo/And:http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2014/03/banned-birther-breaks-br-censorship-barrier/
Good things come to those who wait. Just gotta be patient with them. We all have to grow up a little here and just wait till it's done. Maybe if some of the news leaked out now, it could spoil the rest of the investigations? I don't think that they'd bother with an investigation if there wasn't anything to bring out? We can handle it, we've waited THIS long, and NOBODY in D.C. has came forth to start impeachment hearings against the fraud in our White House. They're promising some SERIOUS offensive stuff from him, just sit tight a bit more, everyone, I'm sure that when it DOES come out, it will be huge. Remember: A watched pot never boils. :-)
Yeah, and someday they will prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that there really is a tooth fairy.
So, again "we are sitting on something soooooo hot" how often are you going to say this without saying anything???? You said this was the latest news so from what I hear the latest news is no news because you said nothing new!
ALL those in Washington who perpetrated this TREASOUS act will be tried for TREASON and be held "ACCOUNTABLE"
I am tired of hearing about it. Put up or shut up. Are going to wait until the Usurper is out of office?
Try to understand the depth of patiencs required to sit on accumulated research results when the insiders involved in crime of such magnitude are sweating buckshot trying to guess when their numbers will be up for a destination with fate. Think about just how many have already left DC in search of closets above the rising tide of elimination and how many know that they are in the protected class only until the sack hits the fan. Possible witnesses that were a threat to a former Arkansas couple were methodically swatted like flies by government agencies years after they were well away from the scene of the original crimes. The depth of coverup today may well exceed that of the JFK episode and on even more continents.
Re "sweating buckshot"---and your evidence for this is? You have the right to dream your dreams. Only, for others who may think that there is a chance of the dreams really being true, remember that Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review have all called birthers crazy.
smr...You never give up, do ya? The evidence is piling up. A special House Select Committee will soon issue subpoenas, call witnesses from Obama down, including Hillary. Can't wait as Rep Gowdy starts shredding the O apparatchiks. Hee hee. Methinks YOU may soon be sweating buckshot, Mr. O Troll.
I have believed from the beginning of his being elected that he was a phony. I even seen a movie clip that he himself said he was born in Kenya. What else do you need to put him away as a fraud. Then when the birth certificate was furnished to the public and the Zullo team proved that it was a forgery proving it line by line. The fact that he has a SS # from a state that he has never lived in should make everyone smell a rat. I have been keeping a whole file of all of the phony stuff that proves he is a fake so why can't someone else put 2 and 2 together. If and when they do remove him from office, all those responsible for checking to see if he was elgible to be our President should all be tried and put in prison. This is a huge crime that nobody should ignore. Mr. L.
Re: "A special House Select Committee will soon issue subpoenas..."That is about BENGHAZI---not the crazy myth that Obama was born in a foreign country.Obama's CT SS number was caused by a data entry error by the way.SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.Millions of people have multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Havehttp://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html
I too have been waiting for all this to unravel. I believe Rep Gowdy will really do it. Plus, Ann Colter has turned about. I believe she and a few others have finally gotten their eyes open. The liberal media has SO MUCH influence and they keep shoveling all these untrue drivual facts about Obama. Why, who knows...maybe threats to their families, but Obama and his agenda is more of a threat to all of our families...
It is good to be optimistic. And, of course, you have a right to your dreams. But I'll be back visiting this site in a month from when the article was posted, June 1, and I'll bet by then neither Sheriff Joe nor anyone else will show that Obama was born in a foreign country.
Why doesn't he just show his real birth certificate if he has one? That is the answer right there. He can't present one because he doesn't have one. There is your proof you idiot liberals!
he won't show his college records either. Some say it is because it shows him registered as a immigrant student.
He won't show his college records because presidents and presidential candidates don't do that. Mitt Romney and John McCain didn't, nor did Clinton or Gore or Reagan or Carter or Ford or Nixon, etc. etc.
Actually, he DID show his birth certificate.Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC. And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. And Obama’s birth in Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, the “Health Bureau Statistics” section, where Obama’s birth notice was published, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).
He is NOT eligible because he is NOT a natural-born citizen according to SCOTUS precedent ruling, Minor vs. Happersett (1875) - look it up and find out. He is knowingly a fraud who conned the American people. Now add sedition and high treason to the long list of Obama and progressive/Democrat crimes. We must not let these whores get away with this, and the best way to restore our Constitution and declare all invalid Obama "laws" and appointments null and void is to challenge and prove he is NOT eligible to serve!
The problem is, is that the Washington politicians of both Parties are part of the slow overthrow of the Constitution. All they do is talk, talk, talk, but without anything of substance being done to prosecute Barack Obama for being the Fraud that he is !
Re Minor v. Happersett. It does not say what birthers think. Look it up and read it. (A hint to keep in mind. If I said "It was never doubted that if you wear both suspenders and a belt you would hold your pants up" does that mean that I'm saying: "you have to wear both suspenders and a belt to hold your pants up"? Answer: NO, obviously it doesn't.)Well, that is all that the Minor v. Happersett ruling said. It said that Virginia Minor, who had both of the two possible ways of being a Natural Born Citizen, was very obviously a US citizen. That is all. It NEVER said that two citizen parents are required in order to be a Natural Born Citizen---and neither did any other ruling of the US Supreme Court.In fact, the Wong Kim Ark case, which was AFTER Minor v. Happersett and hence would overturn it (if Minor v. Happersett were even a ruling on the subject, which it wasn't) said that EVERY child born on US soil is a Natural Born Citizen except for the children of foreign diplomats and enemy invaders.That is why the Heritage Foundation book on the US Constitution said:“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.] And it is right, and you are wrong.More reading on the subject:http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/
Oh, Obama has a real birth certificate. But the cold case posse won't find it in Hawaii nor in Kenya! They need to look in the British archives, that is where his real birth certificate is stored. Kenya was part of the British Commonwealth until December 1963, two years after Obama was born. I found it under Barack Obama's Kenyan Birth Certificate. It is a real EYE OPENER for sure! If I can find it so can anyone else that knows where to look.
If you are an upstanding conservative you really need to stick to the truth. If there were a legal copy of obama's kenyan birth certificate in the British Archives don't you think it would have been produced for our observation on the front pages of every conservative newspaper in the world?
look it up for yourself @ http://thepowerhour.com/news4/obama_kenyan_birth_certificate.htm is where I found Obama's real Kenyan birth certificate & it is still there along with the one where he was a foreign student at occidental college with his picture right on his name tag!
Birthers have forged three "Kenyan birth certificates" and they also forged the "foreign student ID"---which, BTW, is not from Occidental but from Columbia (but Columbia says that its student IDs---wait for it----have never identified foreign students any differently than US students, and you can call the university up yourself, ask for the PR department, and check).The "born in Kenya" story is particularly nutty because; (1) the Kenyan government said that it investigated and that Obama WAS NOT born there; (2) the Hawaii government---officials of both parties including the former Republican governor, and further confirmed by the index data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii papers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii---says that Obama was born there; (3) the US Immigration and Naturalization Service report for that year says that only 21 people total---just twenty-one---came to the USA from Kenya in that year, and that of them all but one came by SHIP, and there were no regular ships from Kenya to Hawaii in 1961.
I am just afraid for their lives. What if they are murdered as so many others have been, before they can release what they have?
They are too much 'out there'. That has saved them. The same thing that has saved Larry Sinclair. And will save anybody else who has some inside info to share about The Great Pretender. Sharing may well demonstrate complicity in a crime. But it is better than being disappeared.
I knew he was a Muslim usurper when I looked at the Trinity Church website back in December 2007; everybody I knew thought I was nuts. They still think I'm nuts. Nothing has changed. It's not going to change because of the corruption that touches every single one of our senators, representatives, etc. Why won't they do anything? Because they're ALL watching their backs and their big fat salaries. Most empires fall from within, when elected officials set their own remuneration; the human nature is corrupted and power corrupts. That's what's wrong, and why no one in Washington is going to do ANYTHING about it.
The reason that the congress voted to confirm Obama's election UNANIMOUSLY after both the 2008 and 2012 elections is that not a single member in the 535 members including Michele Bachmann or Ron Paul believe the nutty story that Obama was born in a foreign country or the birther constitutional theory that two citizen parents are required in order to be a Natural Born Citizen. That term comes from the common law and refers to the place of birth.Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC. And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. And Obama's birth in Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, the "Health Bureau Statistics" section, where Obama's birth notice was published, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).
Re: " A special House Select Committee will soon issue subpoenas...."Answer: Yes, on the subject of BENGHAZI, not Obama's place of birth.
In every case where folks started to expose the Obama birth certificate fraud, going back to 2008, they either finally gave up because of the judicial corruption or something else happened to make them give up, threats? We don't know. Even Murder? I believe Breitbart's death is still highly suspicious because of the convenient timing for Obama. Face it folks these are highly dangerous people that are also the enemies of Freedom and America. They must be treated the same.
Breitbart was an ANTI-birther. He laughed at birthers. See below.The facts are that (1) Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC.And (2) the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. And (3) Obama's birth in Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, the "Health Bureau Statistics" section, where Obama's birth notice was published, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).Oh, and BTW, the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona asked the officials in Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there, and when they did---and confirmed ALL the facts on Obama's birth certificate, the CONSERVATIVE secretary of state of Arizona accepted that as a fact, and he ruled that Obama would be on the ballot in Arizona (as he was in all 50 states).
You obviously haven't read the analysis of these forms of proof from Hawaii, or you would know the short form is NOT proof of birth in the US. Its proof that he was a resident of Hawaii during that time and not necessarily born there. The fraudulent certificate he posted a few years back was proven by forensic experts to be a cut and paste from various documents and not a scan of one document. You probably are one of the undead that voted for Obamanoid not once but twice. I pity you as I would the village idiot.
Re: "............you would know the short form is NOT proof of birth in the US."Answer: The fact that you are poorly informed only shows how poorly informed you are. It does not show that the short form birth certificate is not proof. IT IS proof. In fact, the Hawaii short form birth certificate is accepted as proof of birth in the USA by both the US State Department for issuing birth certificates and the branches of the US military for enlistments.Obama's birth certificate is not forged and the so called "forensic experts" are mainly birther nuts and birther partisans. And they have a MOTIVE for lying about Obama's birth certificate. In fact, it is the same motive that led them to lie about what Obama's Kenyan grandmother said. She never said that Obama was born in Kenya (though birther web sites said that she did). She said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII, but they simply did not quote her and cut off the tape recordings on their sites just before she was asked where he as born------to which she replied: "IN Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time." (I wonder why birther sites cut off the tape recordings on their sites just before she said THAT???)Only birther “experts” have called Obama’s birth certificate forged, and they have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).
One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate. Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois. And birther sites have not shown you these real experts. Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.” Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.” John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded. Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it. Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said. Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.And it is irrational (to say the very least) to think that Obama’s relatives had enough money (Obama’s grandfather was just a furniture salesman and his grandmother a low-level employee in a bank at the time; and his father came to Hawaii on a free flight) or crazy enough to spend LOTS of money on a long and expensive and risky (incidents of stillbirths were high at the time) overseas trip for their pregnant daughter—–when there were perfectly good hospitals in Honolulu, Hawaii. Also, the government of Kenya has said that it investigated the “born in Kenya” claim, and that it did not happen.
Yeah, Breitbart's death was very convenient for obama. I suspect that obama ordered his hit squad to do the dirty.
Breitbart was an ANTI-BIRTHER. He laughed at birthers and called them loony and crazy, and there isn't a shred of a rumor that he was about to change that view. And, BTW, he had a history of heart problems. And, BTW, the LA coroner's technician who died did not participate in Breitbart's autopsy.The same holds for Fuddy (just in case you have that on your mind):Fuddy was just one of FOUR officials who confirmed Obama's birth certificate including the former Republican governor of Hawaii (a friend of Sarah Palin's), and all three of the others are still alive. And Obama's birth in Hawaii is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the paper, called the "Health Bureau Statistics" section, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii). So, if she were murdered (which is unlikely and the police in Hawaii say that he died from an irregular heartbeat, but say that she had been murdered) then the motive for the murder could have been that she was about to cut someone out of her will or a jilted lover did it, or she was about to investigate a major drug company. All of those motives are just as strong as the notion that Obama killed one of four officials who confirmed his birth certificate----when there isn't even a shred of a hint that she was going to change her story and NOT confirm it.
None of you anti-birthers can provide a plausible reason why only this President in history ever issued a Presidential order the month after he was sworn in to seal all his records from release. No one but no one does this unless they have something to hide
Re: " plausible reason why only this President in history ever issued a Presidential order the month after he was sworn in to seal all his records from release. "Answer: Simple----because he DIDN'T. Birthers made it all up.Obama showed his birth certificate, and he did not show his school or college transcripts because other presidential candidates and presidents did not do so either.
The birther elephant crap just keeps flowing.The birth certificate has been debunked so many times I have lost count.
I will believe it when I see it. Almost before he was elected various people have been trying to bring this to the attention of America to no avail. This includes Orly Taitz who finally gave up after 4 years. Through corrupt judges, politicians and media they effectively quashed the birther movement. Even alleged conservative talk show hosts like Limbaugh Ingraham, and Savage were conned into denigrating the birthers; how I don't know. The evidence was more than sufficient for hearings and even trials. It was wretched how many staunch conservatives showed their yellow streak when it came to the birther issue. I don't see how many of these can be trusted ever again. Why should it be different this time.
Re: "how I don't know."Answer: HERE is how.There isn't even evidence that Obama's mother had a PASSPORT in 1961----and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time----and even fewer women, EXTREMELY FEW, traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 due to the risk of stillbirths. Yet birthers hope to convince GULLIBLE people that both of these highly unlikely and EXTREMELY unlikely things took place, and that Obama's birth certificate is forged AND that the officials of both parties are lying (including Linda LIngle), AND that the Index Data file is forged AND that the birth notices in the "Health Bureau Statistics" section of the newspaper were wrong or forged or could have been placed by relatives (they couldn't, only the DOH could send those notices to the "Health Bureau Statistics" section), AND that the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after being told of the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley was mistaken or lying (but her father's name really was Stanley). Only highly GULLIBLE people believe that there is a reasonable chance that all of that happened. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:(1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;(2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);(3) Obama’s relative would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened? (Oh, and once again there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying. )