Monday, May 19, 2014

Breitbart Fires Journalist For Proving Obama Birth Certificate Fraudulent?

According to this rather shocking claim, a well-known journalist was hired by Breitbart specifically to discredit "birther" claims and was fired when his investigative efforts showed that Barack Obama may indeed be fraudulently occupying the Oval Office.




(Birther Report) Johnson revealed that early on Andrew Breitbart hired him to disprove birther claims, to show that birthers are lying and Obama is eligible for presidency.

Johnson, an accomplished investigative journalist, engaged in extensive research and found that Taitz and others are correct, that birther claims are true, that Obama is indeed a fraud and using all bogus IDs.

Johnson went back to Breitbart and other editors of Breitbart.com advising them that birther claims are 100% correct and they should write about it. Breitbart.com editors refused to write about it as they were afraid of persecutions by the IRS and other government agencies.

Read The Full Story



41 comments:

  1. Typical liberal gossip columnist using the news fed them by Obozo to remain part of his circle of minions! The man proved that the birth certificate is a fraud and they don't like it. Real journalists look for the truth and report the truth. Since 2009 we only get what is "approved news", smells like socialism and communism! That's why this administration STINKS!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Amen brother, communism is alive and thriving in the good ole USSA and the sheeple on the left that supported this Muslim-Marxist jihadist are going to rue the day for being so ef'n stupid! REVOLUTION is the SOLUTION to TYRANNY!

      Delete
    2. I don't know what's happening here but I DO NOT believe this. This is NOT what Breitbart was doing when he was alive. Breitbart thought Obama was illegal too.

      Delete
    3. It's to be hoped that the report as written will be published whether or not it agreed with the editorial desires. The story sounds fishy.

      Delete
    4. Re: "The man proved that the birth certificate is a fraud and they don't like it. "

      Who says that "the man proved?" What is the "proof?" The article does not show any proof at all. So who says that he "proved" it? Maybe he does, but the editors don't. And since the article does not show any proof at all, it is highly unlikely that he proved anything.

      Where is the alleged proof that this fellow claims to have? Is it enough to disprove the birth certificate of Hawaii and the confirmation of the officials of both parties in Hawaii and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961?

      No, it isn't. And, BTW, there isn't even evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961 and extremely few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy. Yet you are GULLIBLE enough to think that both of those things happened AND that Obama's mother was able to smuggle Obama from a foreign country to Hawaii without evidence of his being added to her passport (IF she had one) or even getting a US visa (the US does not just allow infants to be carried into the country without legal documents you know) and then, after all three highly unlikely things happened (or so birthers believe), then Obama's relatives were able to get the officials in Hawaii to issue a birth certificate for Obama that says that Obama was born in Kapiolani Hospital despite (as they claim) his being born in a foreign country. You have to be really gullible to believe that all of that happened.

      And, not only that, but some folks on this site indicate not only that they believe that all these unlikely things happened, but that a journalist who has not shown any proof in this article actually has proof that all of those things happened and that a CONSERVATIVE organization fired him, not for his being nutty and not proving what he claimed, but for having proved it.

      NO wonder Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck and the National Review (and Andrew Breitbart many times before he died) all call birthers CRAZY.

      Delete
    5. You are always around to put forth the typical Dem. "talking points" on conservative websites. You must be a paid Dem. troll.

      Delete
    6. Smrstrauss is right. The article does not say what the alleged "proof" was. It only claims that the journalist had "proof"---well, anybody can say that they have proof. But the facts remain that the facts on Obama's Hawaii birth certificate was confirmed by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, and by the public Index Data, and by the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961. And there isn't even an indication that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961, and the number of women who traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 was MINISCULE due to the risk of stillbirths. Yet birthers hope that a few GULLIBLE people will assume that both of these highly unlikely things happened AND that Obama's birth certificate is forged and the the officials of both parties, and the Index Data and the birth notices, are all false. GULLIBLE is the word.

      Delete
  2. I guess Breitbart has sided with the progressives -- I'm very disappointed. Too bad the real Breitbart is no longer with us.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Andrew Breitbart was an ANTI-birther. He called birthers crazy, and there is no evidence whatever that he was about to change.

      Delete
  3. if this is true then Andrew Brietbart's minions have been bought by george the communist soros..

    ReplyDelete
  4. Obama has been a nartistic frud since day one in 2007.He is the biggest liar ever to occupy theWhite House, and his administration, (All of which oue back income taxes) are as crooked and corrupt as the come. They remind me of the Germans who ran the concentration camps, then when tried at the Nuberg Trails pleaded (They were only following orders). And the Republicans, Like our house spealker, the Rhino's, are even worse. I do know that there will be a place, where these people will be judged.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Attacking John Boehner is a popular thing for foolish people to do. That's playing into Obama's hands.

      Delete
  5. they all stink to high heaven but they will not have to worry about getting there they will be joining their boss down below where all the wicked go.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC. And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. And Obama's birth in Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, the "Health Bureau Statistics" section, where Obama's birth notice was published, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).

    And guess what, birther "experts" claim that Obama's birth certificate is forged. Well, what else would you expect? They hate Obama and claim that his birth certificate is forged for that reason. That was the reason that they claim that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya too (she actually said that he was born in HAWAII, repeatedly, but birther sites simply refused to quote her and cut off the tape recordings on their sites just before she was asked where he was born---to which she replied "In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time"---so that people who visited their sites could not see the truth. Birthers who would do that---and who published three forged "Kenyan birth certificates" and forged videos of Obama claiming he said "I was born in Kenya" (but you cannot see his mouth move) and who forged a Columbia University student ID claiming that Obama was a foreign student (but Columbia has never identified foreign students differently from US students on ID cards, and you can call up yourself and ask for the PR department and check) would lie about Obama's birth certificate being forged too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies

    1. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country:

      (1) Obama’s relatives would have had to have been rich enough (and they weren’t. In 1961 Obama’s grandfather was a furniture salesman, and his grandmother was a low-level employee in a bank [she did not become a vice president until 1970], and his father went from Kenya to Hawaii on a free flight) and dumb enough to send their daughter at high risk of stillbirth to a foreign country to give birth—-—despite there being fine hospitals in Hawaii;

      (2) Obama’s mother would have had to have traveled overseas ALONE (since WND has proven with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961) and somehow got Obama back to the USA without getting him entered on her US passport or getting a visa for him (which would have had to have been applied for in a US consulate in that country and the records would still exist);

      (3) Obama’s relative would have had to have gotten the officials in Hawaii to record his birth in Hawaii despite (as birthers claim) his being born in another country and somehow got the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, about the birth in Hawaii of a child to a woman named Stanley to lie (and since the woman’s father’s name really was Stanley, Obama’s relatives would have had to have found one of the very few women in Hawaii with fathers of that name to do it).

      If you sincerely believe that Obama could have been born in a foreign country, then you could answer all three points. For Obama to have been born in a foreign country, all three would have had to have happened.

      So, the question is, what are the chances that all three happened?

      (Oh, and there isn’t even proof that Obama’s mother had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did, and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961 because of the risk of stillbirths. Yet birther sites hope that a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that she was one of the few to have a passport and one of the extremely few women to travel abroad late in pregnancy, and that the birth certificate is forged and the officials of BOTH parties who have confirmed it and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers and the teacher who wrote home are all lying. )

      No wonder the editors at Breitbart got rid of that nut. Andrew Breitbart himself, by the way, was an ANTI-BIRTHER. He laughed at birthers and called them crazy, and there isn't a particle of a shred of a rumor that he was about to change that view.

      Delete
    2. It's not really a question of where Obama was born (important as that may be). For all we know, he may have been born in Hawaii at his grandparent's home and no record other than a newspaper announcement made.

      A serious look at Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate reveals it to be an obvious - and crude - forgery. Presumably, Obama felt the need to show people a real birth certificate and asked (or had one of his aides ask) the Hawaii DOH for a copy, and someone either in Obama's entourage or at HI DOH, not finding a real birth certificate, cobbled one up on their computer and sent it along to Washington.

      As for all the other "birther" issues such as Obama's Social Security number and his college records, etc, etc, there's a lot of smoke there, and probably some fire as well. I think that we need a real investigation of these issues. The Presidency is too important an office to allow such matters to be unresolved. If Obama has nothing to hide, then why has he sealed his records? And why do the Democrats object so strongly to any investigation into the matter?

      Delete
    3. Re: “A serious look at Obama's Long-Form Birth Certificate reveals it to be an obvious - and crude - forgery. “

      Answer: NO. That is simply what birthers claim, and as shown above, they have already shown over and over the MOTIVES that lead them to make that claim.



      Birthers have quoted “experts” who have called Obama’s birth certificate forged, and virtually all of them have not shown that they are even experts, much less fair and impartial. Those are two reasons why they are not believed by Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck or the National Review (or by Mitt Romney or Paul Ryan or Gingrich or Santorum or Huckabee).

      One proof that Obama’s birth certificate is not forged is Obama’s short-form birth certificate.

      Short-form birth certificates are created by a clerk reading the information from the document in the file, and filling out the computer form that generates the printed short-form birth certificate. The officials in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent a short-form to Obama. So, unless they are lying—and they were Republican officials–the only way that Obama’s birth certificate could have been forged was that it was forged in 2007 and slipped into the file just before the clerk looked at the file. That is not very likely, is it? And it is especially unlikely since at the time Obama was not even the candidate of the Democrats. He was still in the primaries at the time, and he was only a junior senator from Illinois.

      And birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

      Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

      Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

      Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily:“All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

      Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

      Delete
    4. Continuing:



      Re: “Presumably, Obama felt the need to show people a real birth certificate and asked (or had one of his aides ask) the Hawaii DOH for a copy, and someone either in Obama's entourage or at HI DOH, not finding a real birth certificate, cobbled one up on their computer and sent it along to Washington.”

      Answer: Obama did feel a need to show his birth certificate, and he did show his real birth certificate TWICE, and as noted the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii (including the former Republican governor, a friend of Sarah Palin’s) have repeatedly said that they sent both the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama. What makes you think that they are lying?

      Re: “Obama's Social Security number…”

      The Connecticut SS number was caused by a data entry error. SS numbers were generated by the zip code of the applicant’s address. Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

      Millions of people have errors in their social security numbers and multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:

      http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

      http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

      Re: “and his college records,”

      Answer: Obama has not shown his college records because Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents and presidential candidates did not show their college records either. He did not, as birthers claim (a nutty claim, like the others) “seal” his records. They and medical records, passport records, etc, etc. are covered under the normal state and federal privacy laws, and as noted Mitt Romney and John McCain did not show theirs either---so Obama’s not showing his does not show “smoke”---it shows the stupidity and malice of birthers.


      Re.; ‘ If Obama has nothing to hide, then why has he sealed his records? “

      Answer: As noted, he did not “seal” his records.

      Re: “And why do the Democrats object so strongly to any investigation into the matter?’

      Answer: They object to checking on whether or not 2+3=5 too or whether the earth is really round. The notion that Obama could have been born in a foreign country and his birth certificate forged is just as nutty.

      Delete
    5. Further to the "sealed" myth and the SS number myth, and for that matter the myth that Obama's selective service registration was forged and that he became an Indonesian citizen. Those all are standard birther LIES.

      Some examples of classic birther lies:

      (1) Birthers said that Obama's draft card was forged, but Obama did not post his draft card, nor did any representative of Obama---so, if it were forged, who do you think forged it? (Okay, I'll make it easy---the guy who posted it. Only she or he had the chance to take the document that the Selective Service Administration delivered under a FOI Act request, fool around with it, and post the image that had been fooled around with. Obama and his representatives could not have because they did not post it.)

      (2) Birthers have said that Obama became a citizen of Indonesia---but a telephone call to the Indonesian Embassy shows that he was never an Indonesian citizen. Why do you suppose that the birthers did not call the Indonesian embassy to check?

      (3) Birthers said that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya---but the transcript of the call shows that she said that he was BORN IN HAWAII---why do you suppose they did not quote her accurately and in fact cut off the tape recording of the call on their sites just before she said "born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time." Why do you suppose they did that?

      (4) Birther sites did not tell you about SS Administration clerks making lots of mistakes and that a single digit entered wrong in the zip code would generated a SS number from a place other than where it was applied from. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

      (5) Birther sites did not tell their readers that the Kenyan government said that Obama was NOT born there. Why do you suppose they did not tell their readers that?

      Delete
    6. (6) Birther sites did not even tell their readers that there is no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961---or how very few 18-year-olds did in those days, or how EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in those days because of the high risk of stillbirth. Why do you suppose they did not tell you that?

      (7) Birther sites posted videos of Obama that claimed to show that he said "I was born in Kenya"---but you cannot see his mouth move and the originals of those videos have been found, and they do not say "I was born in Kenya.."" Why do you suppose that they forged and posted those videos? (Ditto, by the way, for three forged "Kenyan birth certificates." And what do you suppose was the motive for forging them??)

      (8) Birther sites said that Obama spent “millions” on hiding his birth certificate. But Obama showed his birth certificate and did not spend a cent on hiding anything. And in fact, as birther sites did not tell their readers, there wasn’t even one lawsuit for Obama’s birth certificate or for records, not one. There were lawsuits to keep Obama off of ballots, but NO lawsuits for his birth certificate or records of any kind. Why do you suppose that birther sites implied that there were lawsuits for Obama's BC---when there weren't ANY???

      (9) Birther sites said that Obama’s records are “sealed,” but they are not sealed. They are covered under the ordinary state and federal privacy laws, and Mitt Romney and John McCain and previous presidents did not release similar records either.

      And (10) the constant repetition ‘the birth certificates are forged,” and “anyone can see that the birth certificates are forged”---are all birther lies too. And they have the same motives as the lies shown above.

      Birthers have not shown all the real experts who have said that there is nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, nor have they told the readers on birther sites that the officials in Hawaii of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the birth certificates to Obama and confirmed ALL the facts on the copy that the White House put online are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. And they have not explained the research on the Xerox Workstation either:

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

      In short, it is just another birther LIE.

      Delete
    7. @smrstrauss - You are so far up 0bama's butt, even a Rescue team couldn't pull you out !!
      Explain wht, just before exposing the BC as a complete FRAUD, Loraine Fuddy was killed in an aircraft accident in which SHE was the ONLY person aboard KILLED ??
      A 2.5 MILLION to One odds ??
      Now, go hang up your 0bamaPhone, and go finish your Kool-Aid Loser LIB!!

      Delete
    8. Re: "Explain wht, just before exposing the BC as a complete FRAUD, Loraine Fuddy was killed in an aircraft accident in which SHE was the ONLY person aboard KILLED ??"

      Answer: She was also the only person over the age of 65 on the plane, and the photos of her show that she was obviously not in the best shape.

      Fuddy was just one of FOUR officials who confirmed Obama's birth certificate including the former Republican governor of Hawaii (a friend of Sarah Palin's), and all three of the others are still alive. And Obama's birth in Hawaii is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii back in 1961 (and only the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the paper, called the "Health Bureau Statistics" section, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii). So, if she were murdered (which is unlikely and the police in Hawaii say that he died from an irregular heartbeat, but say that she had been murdered) then the motive for the murder could have been that she was about to cut someone out of her will or a jilted lover did it, or she was about to investigate a major drug company. All of those motives are just as strong as the notion that Obama killed one of four officials who confirmed his birth certificate----when there isn't even a shred of a hint that she was going to change her story and NOT confirm it.

      Re: "Now, go hang up your 0bamaPhone, and go finish your Kool-Aid Loser LIB!!"

      Answer: It should be obvious to RATIONAL conservatives that neither liking someone nor disliking someone strongly makes that person born in a foreign country.

      Obama's birth certificate, confirmed by the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, confirmed by the index data, further confirmed by the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii, are proof that Obama was born in Hawaii.

      Moreover, There is no evidence that Obama's mother even had a passport in 1961.

      And, IF she had one----which is highly unlikely since very very few 18-year-olds did in 1961---EXTREMELY few women made such trips abroad when they were in the last few months of pregnancy in 1961 because of the relatively high risk of stillbirth.

      And, IF BOTH of those highly unlikely things did happen and Obama were born during that highly unlikely trip, then HOW did Obama's mother get Obama from that foreign country to Hawaii without having him entered on her passport or even getting a US visa? (We don't just allow infants to be carried into the country without proper documents you know---yet no 1961 passport application or visa application has been found for Obama.)

      In fact, according to nutty birther theory, not only those THREE extremely unlikely things happened but also despite Obama’s having been born in a foreign country -----as they claim------ somehow the family of Obama was able to get Hawaii to issue a birth certificate for him that says that he was born IN KAPIOLANI HOSPITAL. A person would have to be really gullible to believe that there was even a rational CHANCE that all three of those things happened.

      BTW, here are links to SOME of the many confirmations by the officials in Hawaii that they saw Obama’s original birth certificate in the files and that they sent copies of it to him and that all the facts on the copy of Obama’s long form birth certificate online are exactly the same as on what they sent to him:


      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org...


      Here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican (and a friend of Sarah Palin’s), that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital:

      http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html

      Delete
    9. Obama has absolutely NO legal documents to be in this USA! His SSN is a stolen number, from deceased Harry Bounel, of Connecticut, a State his has never resided in. He has never officially used any other, and does not qualify for a legal one! This has been investigated and is irrefutable! He has absolutely NO other legal documents to his name! He has nothing that will pass 'E-Verify'! The Bum must be thrown out of the country before he completes his mission to destroy America!

      Delete
    10. The "birth certificates" posted by Obama at his web site are obvious forgeries. Where he was born is not known by anyone for sure other than his mother. But his actions prove he is not a patriotic citizen of this republic. He is a fraud by any measure, acting against the Republic in every possible way.

      Delete
    11. Hey smrstrauss, for all the jib jab typing you do you sure don't say much. Go back to movinon.org and spew your crap to the other morons that will believe it, you have no respect here MORON.

      Delete
    12. The Harrison J. Bounel story has been punctured. The SS Administration says that there are no Social Security files for Bounel, so he does not have a SS number and Obama could not use it. Obama's number failed E-Verify because once his number had been published, he had it cancelled (people do that when their SS numbers become public because otherwise other people can use the number), and when a birther tried the old SS number on E-Verify, it had been cancelled, so it failed, naturally.

      Re "obvious forgeries." No that is simply what birthers claim over and over and over---but, duh, they have a MOTIVE for making that claim. It is the same motive that made birthers claim that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya----when she really said over and over that he was born IN HAWAII (birther sites simply cut off the tape recordings of the interview on their sites just before she said "In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time"---now, I wonder why they did that???).

      Their MOTIVE for saying that Obama's birth certificate is forged and "obviously forged" is the same as their reason for lying about what the grandmother said, and the same motive for their forgery of three "Kenyan birth certificates" and the same motive for forging videos claiming that Obama said "I was born in Kenya" (but, duh, you cannot see his mouth move) and the same motive as behind the forgery of a "Columbia University Student ID card" that claims that Obama was entered as a foreign student (but Columbia has never identified foreign students differently from US students on its ID cards, and you can call the university's PR department yourself and check). The motive behind all these lies and forgeries is the same as the motive behind saying that Obama's birth certificate is "obviously forged." The fact is that the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that every fact on the copies that were put online is EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him.

      Delete
  7. For each and every person who believes everything they hear coming from Obama or his friends or his puppetiers you must understand that each of these people get up every morning with one thing in mind and that is to have a large bowl of STUPID for breakfast.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Notice that Anonymous did not respond to the facts. Not one single fact.

      Delete
    2. Replying to your post(s)...:
      And A Partridge In A Pear Tree"

      Delete
    3. Why anyone would want to waste time by replying to foolish claims is not clear. The ACTIONS of Obama prove that he is in no way a patriotic citizen of this nation.

      Delete
    4. Re: "Obvious forgeries."

      Sure they were. Are you trying to sell us a bridge---or did you buy one?

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

      Notice that neither Maynard Robert nor Ray Downen responded to the facts. Not one fact. As for you considering that Obama is not patriotic. That is your right, but it still doesn't show that Obama was born in a foreign country.

      Obama has shown both his Hawaii short-form BC (the Certification of Live Birth, COLB, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year), and he has shown his long form Hawaii BC. And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. And Obama's birth in Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, the "Health Bureau Statistics" section, where Obama's birth notice was published, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).

      Delete
    5. smrstrauss has all this in a Word document somewhere. I saw an almost identical word dump in a series of postings over a week ago on a different site. He is definitely on a Soros crusade to defend the imposter -- whether he's doing it for pay or as a passionate zombie, I dunno.

      Delete
    6. Notice that Anonymous has not responded to a single fact. Not one. I wonder why not??

      Delete
  8. he is an illegal alien and must be deported. his connecticut drivers license says he was born in 1890.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Obama was born in Hawaii. See the facts listed above. What is more there isn't even evidence that his mother had a passport in 1961----and very very few 18-year-olds did in those days, and even fewer, EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy at the time due to the risk of stillbirths (and Obama's mother could not have traveled early in pregnancy because of the college schedule). And yet birthers hope to convince GULLIBLE people that both of those extremely rare things happened, and that Obama's mother gave birth abroad was able to get Obama to Hawaii without even applying for him to be added to her passport or for a US visa (the USA does not just allow infants to be carried into the country without documents you know---yet birthers have never explained how she could have gotten Obama from a foreign country to Hawaii without either of those documents or how, if they existed, they could have been lost). And in addition to those three highly unlikely things happening, birthers hope that GULLIBLE people will believe that Obama's relatives were able to get the officials in Hawaii to nevertheless issue a birth certificate that said on it that Obama was born in Kapiolani Hospital. You have to be highly GULLIBLE to believe that there is even a rational chance that all of that happened.

      Re "Drivers license." Start off by getting your claims straight. Birthers claim that Obama's SS number is false, not his drivers license. And that also is false. The CT SS number was caused by a data entry error, and the 1890 date is a birther myth without a shred of proof behind it.


      Delete
  9. Always remember that there is an element of truth to every story and I believe this threat of an IRS assault scared Breitbart off from publishing the story (cowards that this new Breitbart group are. So uncharacteristic of the founder who roils in his grave!).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: "IRS assault."

      Try to think a little. The IRS can only harm you if you have failed to pay the taxes that you owe. Are you implying that the Breitbart group has been cheating on its taxes? If not, it has nothing to fear. Same with other laws. Therefore the reason that the editors turned down the "proof" was that it was not really proof at all. It was lunacy. (And BTW, you notice that there is no mention in this article about what the alleged "proof" was.)

      Delete
  10. Nice cut and paste job, smrstrauss. Every new article, the same stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Every time the nuts who hate Obama come out with a new myth that claims that Obama was born in a foreign country and his birth certificate forged, it is good that smrstrauss publishes the facts. Too bad birthers are too irrational to recognize them.

      Smrstrauss is right. Breitbart was an ANTI-birther. He laughed at birthers and called them crazy---and there is no indication that he was about to change his opinion.

      Delete
  11. Smrstrauss or better said ...JAY, the SS# fails e verify...how " coincidental" the aunt worked at SS in Hawaii, SS# not refuted on IRS form, you obviously hit the jury box like a junior attorney, but you fail the smell test. The OC wording that browbeats any counter thought shows how rehearsed you are. You defend a traitor...therefore...can you figure out the rest???

    ReplyDelete
  12. Re: " the SS# fails e verify...how " coincidental..."

    Answer: Actually the answer is simple. When Obama's SS number was published and discussed on the Web, he cancelled it and got a new one (that is what people normally do when their SS numbers have been published to prevent them being used by someone else). So, when the old number was checked under E-Verify, it failed because it had been cancelled.

    Re: "" the aunt worked at SS in Hawaii...:

    Answer: Obama did not have an aunt living in Hawaii, and his grandmother (which is the usual birther story) DID NOT WORK FOR SS.

    Smrstrauss is right. Breitbart was an ANTI-birther. He laughed at birthers and called them crazy. And there is no indication that he had ever changed or was tending to change that view.

    ReplyDelete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche