Saturday, November 10, 2012

[Video] The Real Reason Petraeus Resigned?

(Western Journalism) Petraeus towed the party line with the video but refused to fall on the sword and say the CIA gave this stand down order, thus implicating that it was Obama who had denied help to both the consulate and CIA annex which later came under attack.

Get The News The Liberal Media Refuses To Print!

Input Your Primary Email Address Below And You'll Receive A Free Gift, Our Downloadable Report On The Cloward-Piven Strategy.

 

 

 

Privacy Policy: We respect your privacy and will not share your email address with ANYONE... PERIOD!

RELATED STORIES

17 comments:

  1. We know that the "illegal alien" REFUSED TO HELP
    the Embassy in Bengazi. We also know that Petraus "covered up" FOR THE "alien." What else is new? Isn't it about time to impeach the "alien?"

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Petraeus still needs to testify. This resignation is not an excuse for it.
      ISSA needs to continue to press and subpoena him.

      Delete
    2. Yes he should have been impeached years ago. He is not eligible; does not respect nor follow the constituion; bypasses congress on thousands of laws. What in the world is Congress doing. Taking home a paycheck, but not doing their job.

      Delete
    3. It far past the time Obama should have been impeached. It seems we elect politicians with BALLS but the minute they enter Washibton D.C. they are emasculated!!!Or are they paid off????

      Delete
  2. An Extra marital Affair my backside! Thios gal was ordered to seduce Petrayus in order to blckmail him into covering up for the Impostor Obama! Sure Obam's homosexual encounters are overlooked but a case of hide the salami with a person of the opposite sex is not!?? A man has to be almost super human in order to refuse a sexual offer in a time of great stress, albeit domestic or jobwise related. If it was overseas it would bhe Foreign Relations anyway. ( just couldn't resist that crack. {No pun intended here either} ) I hiope that seductress is satisfied and can look herself in the mirror's reflection. ~Rick Magee, FL

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hussein not only is ineligible, commite dnumerous acts of treason, murdered Americans, but his election was stolen. Here are the facts. study them carefully.

    Crooked Politics: Obama Lost in Every State With Photo ID Law

    November 7 | Was the election stolen? Remember all those lawsuits by Democrats demanding that any voter identification laws be repealed. Well, now we know why they filed them. They needed to steal the vote in certain key states so that Obama could be reelected.

    Curiously, Obama lost in every state that requires a photo ID to be produced before voting. A list of closely contested state elections with no voter ID, which narrowly went to Obama include: Minnesota (10), Iowa (6), Wisconsin (10), Nevada (6), Colorado (9), New Mexico (5) and Pennsylvania (20). This amounts to a total of 66 electoral votes. When added to Romney’s total of 205 electoral votes, that would give Romney 271 electoral votes, enough votes to win even without Ohio or Florida.

    Romney also likely had the states of Florida and Ohio stolen from him, which don’t require photo IDs. Ohio requires a non-photo ID. Would a library card do? Florida “requests” a photo ID, but doesn’t require it. So what happens if they request a photo ID and the illegal alien Haitian doesn’t have one? Do they just count the vote anyway?

    Election Comparison Voter Id Laws

    Add to all this, electronic vote fraud. An article from the Blaze reports “Last week, TheBlaze brought you a story from a North Carolina voting precinct using electronic voting machines that was already experiencing issues where votes for GOP candidate Mitt Romney were being changed to Democratic candidate Barack Obama. Now, it’s allegedly happening again, this time in both Kansas and Ohio — and we talked to a vendor supporting the machines about the issue. Nancy from Topeka, Kan., who asked that her last name not be used for reasons pertaining to her husband’s work, told TheBlaze she fears if voters aren’t double checking their selections, they’ll be ‘robbed of their vote.’ Nancy explained that while her husband was casting a vote for Romney, the touchscreen highlighted Obama. “He played around with the field a little and realized that in order to vote for Romney, his finger had to be exactly on the mark,” Nancy wrote in an email. She said ‘the invisible Obama field came down about 1/4 [of an inch]‘ into what should technically have been the Romney area”

    Funny how this “glitch” only benefited Obama while stealing votes from Romney. I wonder how many other “glitches” were out there and how big a role they played in Obama’s “victory”.

    No incumbent president in the last 60 years has won reelection with the unemployment rate as high as it currently is. The only way left for the Democrats to keep Obama in office was to steal the election. Obama failed to win ANY states with photo ID laws for voters, but he did win all the swing states which require no voter ID. Add to this electronic “glitches” that gave Obama votes meant for Romney, and it’s pretty obvious what happened on November 6th, 2012. We just became a Third World country.

    In Chicago, Obama shows his ID before voting. (Illinois has no Voter ID Law.)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gee, who would have thought it, if a man will lie to you , he will steal from you, obammy has done both !!!!

      Delete
  4. The problem is that we use diversions to keep people looking away from the real story, the real tragedy. We provide a straw man to blame and burn in effigy, missing the truths and learning from them. Its not
    Bush's problem, its not the mistress, its not the storm, its the fact that there is a failed narrative in the US that we are being run by a brilliant, all loving, all caring, all knowing being - which when we
    were a religious based country we were, but now with this post-modern give-away society of Obama we are not. He is a flawed, self-centered, self-obsessed man with poor ideas, lacking in brilliance and vision
    (except to destroy America) and lacking in good policies both domestically and foreign. Punishment and rewards are messed up - punish the successful, reward the lazy, punish our friends (Israel, leaders who support us, our troops, etc) and reward the zealots who wish to change society and then we sit back and allow the people we tried to take down to re-form, plan and successfully attack our people in Libya by leaving them defenseless to begin with and by not going to their aid when needed. We failed, or rather Obama and his team of Chicago thugs failed

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thr word is "toed" not "towed". I don't think he pulled the party line.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I know it seems trivial when related to a serious article like this, but the author should know that Petraeus "toed" the party line, not "towed" it. It makes me crazy when I start to read about an important topic and see misspelled words or words used incorrectly. It makes me doubt the knowledge and veracity of the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Fussing about spelling is an even better sign of incompetence. We all know what the guy meant. This isn't a spelling contest. Get over it!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Words have meanings and when they are used in the wrong context it changes the impact of the statement. I agree with the 8:05 PM comment. If one cannot used correct wording how can I know what he/she is trying to say?

      Delete
    2. "Fussing about spelling is an even better sign of incompetence. We all know what the guy meant. This isn't a spelling contest. Get over it!"

      Eloquently stated!

      And since people are being hyper-critical, spelling is probably not a consideration, rather, the author probably made a fairly common mistake on the meaning of the idiomatic expression.

      But... let's not get distracted. The important thing is that this whole Petraeus affair is being used to avert attention from the crimes of the Obama administration.

      Delete
  8. I hate to even consider many of those idiotic conspiracy theories that are floating around these days, and, instead, I prefer to believe in our elected government to get things back on an even keel! BUT, this whole thing is just too coincidental and I just dont believe in this much coincidence! Benghazi is definitely a "smoking gun" for Obama. His involvement in this whole thing and the blatant cover-up is becoming very serious for him! AND, just when the outcry is reaching a fever pitch..low and behold!..the CIA Director resigns due to an affair, and the media immediately switches from Benghazi to Petraeus and his "hot" little plaything and not another word has been printed about our four dead patriots and why they died!! Yup!..Now I DO believe in conspiracies! But, then, this involves the "Chosen One" and nobody would dare call him to task on ANYTHING he does or says! That's the state of our Union today!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sad but true! Even sadder is our court system has let us down - all the judges that could have made a difference "wimped out"; journalists, who should be the harbingers of truth, faithfully follow the party line like so many sheep; the Department of Justice is up to their hind parts in corruption and the blood of U.S. and foreign citizens, not to mention they operate on the principle, "The boss isn't always right but he is always boss;" the Constitution is supposed to be the supreme law of the land but has been turned into a meaningless piece of paper by the courts, our "justice" system, our elected "leaders," as well as those we rely on to enforce the laws. This could go on and on, but, anyone with an I.Q. higher than their hat size would get the idea.

      Delete
  9. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche