Tuesday, July 16, 2013

Trayvon Friend Admits: Trayvon Gave Zimmerman A 'Whoop-Ass'

That's the recent admission from Trayvon Martin's friend, Rachel Jeantel who apparently claimed that there is a difference between a "beating" and a "whoop-ass" ...

(WND) In an interview with CNN’s Piers Morgan, Jeantel insisted that Zimmerman and the jury didn’t have the cultural awareness to understand that Martin wasn’t giving the defendant a "bashing" but merely a “whoop-a–,” Breitbart News noted.

Jeantel, who was on the phone with Martin shortly before he was shot by Zimmerman Feb. 26, 2012, explained: "They don’t understand, they understand, 'Oh, he would just bash, or was kill.' When somebody bash somebody, like, blood, people, trust me, in the area I live, that’s not bashing. That’s just called "whoop-ass." You just got your ass whooped. That’s what it is.’

Breitbart’s Joel Pollack noted Morgan tried to save Jeantel’s statement by asking her whether Martin would have “whooped a–” in self-defense, but the damage was done. The camera, he pointed out, caught a member of the audience reacting in shock at Jeantel’s admission.

Keep Reading

FREE REPORT: Is Barack Obama Trying To Destroy The US Economy!

Input Your Primary Email Address Below And You'll Receive A Free Gift, Our Downloadable Report On The Cloward-Piven Strategy.

 

 

 
Privacy Policy: We respect your privacy and will not share your email address with ANYONE... PERIOD!

RELATED STORIES

2 comments:

  1. I believe it is many of the black "so-called" ministers jesse Jackson and al Sharpton, ETC>
    who keep(RACISM) alive...., true, for some reason,(?) there are also some whites who don't like blacks, and it is true that black people still believe that they are picked on, mostly in jury trials....
    When they (don't like) a verdict, they "honestly" believe it was then "UN-fair".

    The whites believed the O.J. trial was'falsely' adjudicated, but we didn't riot, damage, pick on blacks in groups, loot, etc.
    We had to live and accept the juries verdict !!!

    In the travon martin case, the jury was "NOT" even allowed to hear the TRUTH about this
    "sweet" little young boy, who incidentally his REAL up TO DATE picture was never shown, and the jury was "NOT" told what he was REALLY carrying, NOR of his Police "fact sheet" of offenses , which were with-held because of a police chief , who was "fired" when an investigation was held....

    Still, 'with-held' evidence that was "NOT" allowed, "Z" was (acquitted) by a jury...
    it is the system which we ALL should live by.....!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. perhaps if the ignorant ho learned english instead of ebonics the stupid white women on the jury would have understood her better

    ReplyDelete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche