Friday, August 10, 2012

Video: As Evidence Of Team Obama Lawbreaking Surfaces: Wimpy RNC Simply Says They "Lied"

The newest commercial from the RNC which claims that Barack Obama's Deputy Campaign Manager Stephanie Cutler lied may already be old news, but there is still an un-asked question that the RNC is very wimpily neglecting to explore or even mention; namely, did Cutler also break the law? And, if so, did anyone over at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue know of Cutler's actions and thereby violate the law as well.

We already know that Cutler lied. The video doesn't leave much room for doubt. It's implausible for Cutler to say, “I don’t know the facts” about Soptic, only weeks after hosting a conference call with reporters where she invited Soptic to tell his story.

The RNC released a statement on the YouTube page where they initially posted the video: "The Republican National Committee releases 'What Else?' as President Obama's campaign continues to lie about its relationship with the disgusting ad put out by President Obama's Super PAC. After refusing to denounce the lies and distortion of the ad, the Obama campaign repeatedly claimed it had no idea about Joe Soptic's story even though they had him tell the same story during an OFA conference call earlier this spring. So, their actions beg the question-what else are they lying about?"

"What else are they lying about indeed."

Relying on advisories from the Federal Election Commission (FEC), Wikipedia states: "Super PACs are not allowed to coordinate directly with candidates or political parties. This is intended to prevent them from operating campaigns that complement or parallel those of the candidates they support or engaging in negotiation that could result in quid pro quo bargaining between donors to the PAC and the candidate or officeholder."

Commentator Pat Buchanan accused the Obama White House of "cynical silence" and of being "complicit in this moral atrocity" in regards to the incident. Is it unreasonable to ask just how deep the White House's complicity goes, and exactly who in the White House may be complicit, when one considers the distinct possibility that criminal activity may have taken place?

Cutler's actions certainly rouse suspicion. First the Obama campaign uses Soptic in a commercial attacking Mitt Romney. Then Cutler invites Soptic to speak on a conference call with reports. Then a Super PAC features Coptic and his story in a totally separate ad. The chain of events could have been dismissed as a coincidence or a totally uncoordinated attempt by the Super PAC to piggy-back off of something the Obama campaign had already done.

But then, Cutler lied. And we are left to ask why... why did she see the need to lie?

Of course, the fact that Cutler is clearly lying is not conclusive and cut-and-dry proof that actual "coordination" took place, but where there is smoke, there is fire, and there's enough smoke here to engulf an entire city. At the very least, Cutler's lie is more than enough to warrant an investigation, even by the liberal media's own standards.

Less than two months ago, The Washington Post agonized that the Romney campaign may be coordinating with Super PACs connected to Karl Rove simply because Rove attended a get-together hosted by Romney.

"Republican candidate Mitt Romney is hosting GOP strategist Karl Rove at a retreat for his biggest donors in Utah this weekend, raising objections about coordination between Romney’s presidential campaign and two interest groups advised by Rove, American Crossroads and Crossroads GPS."

Did Cutler and a Super PAC that supports Mr. Obama's candidacy coordinate their efforts and, if so, what did the White House know and when did they know it. It's a question that begs to be answered if only someone would ask it? Are you listening Mr. Boehner... Mr. McConnell?

2 comments:

  1. McConnell/Boehner have their drawers drawn up so far into their rusty butts their respective wedgies overwhelm their thought processes. As for Reince Preibus the joke for a RNC chairman sheds light on his unwillingness to sincerely win an election. They chose their poster boy Mitt Romney to carry the torch but left him on his own afterwards with about as much backing as they gave their senile RINO John McCain. Sarah Palin gave such a rousing speech on the convention floor in 2008 that it shot McCain the old rustbucket himself up in the polls where Oboy would not have gotten elected. After that, the establishment RINO whores sequestered her until all the air ran out McCain's tires. He'd been a one termer anyway due to age which would've left Sarah Barracuda sending corrupt RINOS off to jail and cleaning up the Grand Old Party once she'd easily gotten elected as first female POTUS. 4 years later she's still well
    liked versus the tired old farts who remain the darlings of the establishment. Time for a new two party system,God willing. DummycratRINO versus Tea Party. This country doesn't have need for those old dinosaurs anymore who are killing us both financially and with endless nonsense of more taxes,more regulations,more crap,and more cronyism to feed their corruption. Romney's not the answer but remains as anything better than Obama the Great Prevaricator. I didn't vote for the scum and his skin color had nothing to do with it. I co-join with a lot of black folks who think Obama hurt them more than help them and is just a live high on the hog on somebody else's money snake oil salesman. P.T. Barnum said,"There's a sucker born every minute" and 2008 proved it with the American voters. By the way who cares about Hollywood's opinion? With few exceptions, they're just a bunch of dope infested freaks with airheads for women and low I.Q. men with too much money to spend. BFD!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. why defend someone that smells like three day old fish scraps?

      Delete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche