Obama Forcing Pro-Life Groups To Hire Abortion Activists
Is this the straw that broke the camel's back? How long must we tolerate this tyranny? ...
(Life News) Hours after the Senate allowed a controversial anti-discrimination law to officially take effect in the nation’s capital, a group of pro-life organizations released a joint statement pledging to continue operating in accordance with their beliefs—thereby putting themselves at risk of violating the law.
"Despite the enactment of this unjust law, we will continue to hire employees who share our commitment to the dignity of every member of the human family," reads the statement released by Alliance Defending Freedom, the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Americans United for Life and Americans United for Life Action, March for Life, Concerned Women for America, the Susan B. Anthony List, the Family Research Council and the Assoc. of Christian Schools International.
The very purpose of this bill as expressed by its sponsor at the first hearing last June was to require religious employers to provide insurance coverage of all 'reproductive health' decisions to their employees, including abortion...
Read The Full Story
(Life News) Hours after the Senate allowed a controversial anti-discrimination law to officially take effect in the nation’s capital, a group of pro-life organizations released a joint statement pledging to continue operating in accordance with their beliefs—thereby putting themselves at risk of violating the law.
"Despite the enactment of this unjust law, we will continue to hire employees who share our commitment to the dignity of every member of the human family," reads the statement released by Alliance Defending Freedom, the Southern Baptist Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Americans United for Life and Americans United for Life Action, March for Life, Concerned Women for America, the Susan B. Anthony List, the Family Research Council and the Assoc. of Christian Schools International.
The very purpose of this bill as expressed by its sponsor at the first hearing last June was to require religious employers to provide insurance coverage of all 'reproductive health' decisions to their employees, including abortion...
Read The Full Story
No comments:
Post a Comment