Thursday, September 11, 2014

[Video] Canadian TV Host Unloads On Obama's 'Birth Certificate'

Richard Syrett, the man behind the recent Canadian television special that honestly probes the controversy surrounding Obama's so-called "birth certificate," spills the beans to KNUS radio talk show host Peter Boyles.




16 comments:

  1. There is nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate. Birthers simply claim that it is forged---well, what else would you expect them to do? It is simply one of their many lies---like the lie that said that Obama's Kenyan grandmother had said he was born in Kenya (when she actually said that he was born IN HAWAII---want to see the transcript of the call?).

    Birther sites have not shown their readers all the many real experts who say there is nothing wrong with Obama's birth certificate. Nor have they explained the research on how the Xerox WorkCentre works:

    http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

    NOR have they told their readers that the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, including the former Republican governor of Hawaii (a strong supporter of Sarah Palin), have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that all the facts on the copy that the White House put online are exactly the same as on what they sent to him. Nor have they explained to their readers that the birth notices sent to the "Health Bureau Statistics" sections of the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 could ONLY come from the DOH of Hawaii, and that at the time the DOH only sent out birth notices to children that it had issued birth certificates to---and that at the time the DOH of Hawaii was not allowed to issue birth certificates to children who were not born IN Hawaii.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The only problem with your "facts" is that a birth certificate was never produced, only a certificate of live birth being passed off to the gullible as one!!

      Delete
    2. Re: "Only a certificate of live birth."

      Certificates of Live Birth and Certifications of Live Birth are fancy names for birth certificates. Obama has shown both his Certification of Live Birth (in Hawaii, the short form) and his Certificate of Live Birth (in Hawaii, the long form).

      In MICHIGAN, the names are reversed, the Certificate of Live Birth is the short form, and that is all that Michigan normally issues these days, and that is what Mitt Romney showed:

      https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1024&bih=615&q=mitt+romney+birth+certificate&oq=mitt+romney+birth+certificate&gs_l=img.12..0.1481.8724.0.11767.29.13.0.0.0.0.2081.2081.9-1.1.0....0...1ac.1.53.img..28.1.2080.iL6uTlHhIyQ

      (See the name on it? It says: Certificate of Live Birth."

      That, BTW, is all that Mitt Romney showed. He did not show his long form birth certificate, and in his case the officials of Michigan did not confirm his birth certificate---unlike the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii who repeatedly confirmed Obama's birth certificate. And there is also the confirming FACTS of the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii.

      Here are the confirmations of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, repeated confirmations (and by the way, the one to the secretary of state of Arizona, a conservative Republican, was ACCEPTED by the secretary of state of Arizona, who then put Obama on the ballot):

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/


      Here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican (and a friend of Sarah Palin’s), that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital:

      http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html

      Here is the statement of the teacher who wrote home to her father, named Stanley, after being told of birth in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, of a child to a woman named Stanley:

      http://web.archive.org/web/20110722055908/http://mysite.ncnetwork.net/res10o2yg/obama/Teacher%20from%20Kenmore%20recalls%20Obama%20was%20a%20focused%20student%20%20Don%27t%20Miss%20%20The%20Buffalo%20News.htm

      Here are the birth notices of Obama's birth in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961:

      http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/obamabirth.php

      (And as you can see the section of the paper is called "Health Bureau Statistics". Well, as the name indicates, and as both the papers and the DOH confirm, ONLY the DOH could send notices to that section of the paper, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii.)

      Here is the Index Data file:

      http://www.cleveland.com/nation/index.ssf/2011/04/in_hawaii_its_easy_to_get_birt.html

      Moreover, talk about GULLIBLE, there is no indication whatever that Obama’s mother even had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy. Yet birthers hope a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that both of those happened and that Obama’s birth certificate is forged and the officials of both parties are lying and the Index Data and the birth notices are forged and the INS inspector made an error in his “one child, born in Honolulu” note and the teacher who wrote home was lying. But you’d have to be terribly GULLIBLE to think that all of that happened.

      Delete
    3. one word...........
      *** PHOTOSHOP ***

      Delete
    4. Re: "Photoshop."

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/11/blogger-shows-obama-birth-certificate-artifacts-caused-by-xerox-machine-no-joy-in-birtherville/

      Moreover:

      Birther sites have not shown you these real experts.

      Dr. Neil Krawetz, an imaging software analysis author and experienced examiner of questioned images, said:“The PDF released by the White House shows no sign of digital manipulation or alterations. I see nothing that appears to be suspicious.”

      Nathan Goulding with The National Review: “We have received several e-mails today calling into question the validity of the PDF that the White House released, namely that there are embedded layers in the document. There are now several other people on the case. We looked into it and dismissed it.… I’ve confirmed that scanning an image, converting it to a PDF, optimizing that PDF, and then opening it up in Illustrator, does in fact create layers similar to what is seen in the birth certificate PDF. You can try it yourself at home.”

      John Woodman, independent computer professional, who is a member of the Tea Party (who says that he hates Obama’s policies but found no evidence of forgery) said repeatedly in his book and in various articles on his Web site that the claims that Obama’s birth certificate was forged were unfounded.

      Ivan Zatkovich, who has testified in court as a technology expert, and consultant to WorldNetDaily: “All of the modifications to the PDF document that can be identified are consistent with someone enhancing the legibility of the document.” And, by the way, when WND received Zatkovich’s article that said that he found nothing wrong with Obama’s birth certificate, WordNDaily simply did not publish it.

      Jean-Claude Tremblay, a leading software trainer and Adobe-certified expert, who has years of experience working with and teaching Adobe Illustrator, said the layers cited by doubters are evidence of the use of common, off-the-shelf scanning software — not evidence of a forgery.“I have seen a lot of illustrator documents that come from photos and contain those kind of clippings—and it looks exactly like this,” he said.

      Birthers’ claim that Obama’s birth certificate is false is well understood to be caused by their own motives—they hate Obama and would like to harm him.

      Moreover, the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama and that ALL the facts on the one published by the White House are EXACTLY the same, that they MATCH, the facts on what they sent to Obama.


      Here are the confirmations of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, repeated confirmations (and by the way, the one to the secretary of state of Arizona, a conservative Republican, was ACCEPTED by the secretary of state of Arizona, who then put Obama on the ballot):

      http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2013/01/heres-the-birth-certificate/


      Here is the confirmation by the former governor of Hawaii, Linda Lingle, a Republican (and a friend of Sarah Palin’s), that says that Obama was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital:

      http://voices.washingtonpost.com/right-now/2010/05/hawaii_gov_lingle_answers_the.html

      Delete
  2. the person that commented on 9-12-14, at 6:48 a.m. you have not got all the facts .the no. does not match the others nos. issued the year he was born --from the soc.sec. office, you might ck. it out ? birdydog7@aol.com --said that--.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re "the no. does not match"

      If you are referring to the number of Obama's birth certificate not being in chronological order, the answer is simple. They were not numbered in chronological order. They were numbered as they were issued in batches.

      If you are referring to Obama's Social Security number being from Connecticut. That is easy to explain too. There were millions of mistakes in entering data in the Social Security Administration (did you think that SS clerks never made mistakes???), and the CT SS number was the result of hitting a digit wrong in entering the zip code---which generated the SS number.

      Obama’s address in Hawaii was in zip code 96814, and the zip code for Danbury, CT. is 06814.

      Millions of people have errors in their social security numbers and/or multiple social security numbers caused mainly by data entry errors:

      http://www.cnbc.com/id/38678753/How_Many_Social_Security_Numbers_Do_You_Have

      http://www.securityworldnews.com/2010/08/12/20-million-americans-have-multiple-social-security-numbers-associated-with-their-name/

      http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-501465_162-20013733-501465.html

      Delete
  3. I guess that my answer to all of this is NO.1 I was in Hawaii in1961 and I don't remember ever seeing this quaint little family an any beaches that I visited and I believe that I visited most every beach that was in Honolulu at that time In fact I was in Hawaii until 1963. NO.2 If the people that wrote these articles are so sure that Obama is an American citizen then why does he spend millions to three attorneys to keep his past locked up when he has repeatedly been asked to produce these papers. Also Hawaii was not officially declared a state until 1962 so he could not be a natural born citizen. Personally I do not buy into the fact that Barack Obama was ever born in or ever was a citizen of the United States there are to many flaws in his background.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: " then why does he spend millions to three attorneys to keep his past locked up "

      Answer: Because that is simply another birther LIE. He has never spent a cent. In fact, there were no lawsuits against him for documents or records---only to have him thrown off of the ballot. Obama spent a little money (it does not cost very much to file the same papers over and over) on staying on the ballot. But he did not spend anything on hiding anything.

      Re: "Hawaii was not officially declared a state until 1962 "

      Answer: Your unwillingness to check on your dreams before you post them as facts is embarrassing to you and to the right wing of the Conservative movement. Hawaii became a state in 1959. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hawaii

      Re "flaws in his background." Not liking someone and finding "flaws" in that person's background does not make that person born in a foreign country. There are plenty of flawed people who were born in the USA.

      Delete
  4. Well all I can say is every other word out of his mouth is a lie so why would we believe this. If his past was legit why did and is he hiding it. I laughed when the idiot O'Reilly said he researched the BC and said it was legit because he found 2 notifications in the papers record anyone with a few billion dollars to spare (Soros)could create that microfiche record with the wave of a few dollars . Show us a genuine hardcopy of actual original printed paper.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: "If his past was legit why did and is he hiding it. "

      Answer: He isn't. Obama published his short form birth certificate, the OFFICIAL BIRTH CERTIFICATE of Hawaii, way back in June 2008---five months before the election of that year. And the officials of BOTH parties have repeatedly confirmed that they sent it to him (as they have for the long form BC, which Obama published in April 2011).

      Re: "Soros)could create that microfiche record with the wave of a few dollars."

      Answer: The microfilm record was found by a backer of Hillary, who was hoping to prove that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii, way back in 2008 BEFORE Obama was even selected as the candidate of the Democrats that year. In other words, he was at the time only a junior senator from Illinois. The idea that Soros would have spent money on a junior senator from Illinois who was not even the selected candidate of the Democrats (he would be more likely to spend it on Hillary) at that time is nutty.

      Moreover, there isn't even a hint that Obama's mother HAD A PASSPORT in 1961----and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time. And EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy at the time due to the relatively high risk of stillbirths.

      YET you are GULLIBLE enough to assume that both of those highly unlikely things happened AND that Obama's birth certificate and the microfilms of the newspaper press announcements are forged AND that the officials of both parties (including the former Republican governor) are lying.

      Re "show us a genuine hardcopy."

      That is like saying: "Prove to us once again that 2+3 really does equal five."

      Delete
  5. You'd think that with all the questions, and there are enough to make one wonder what the truth might be, that the Obama's would want to clear it up so everyone knows that he was born
    in the USA and is qualified--at least by birth--to be President. That might be the only way anyone will ever say that Obama was qualified to be President, because his experience certainly didn't,
    not did his experiences as the worst President ever elected.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Re: "all the questions...there are enough to make one wonder what the truth might be, that the Obama's would want to clear it up so everyone knows that he was born."

      Obama has published his birth certificate. In fact, he has done it twice, and that shows where he was born. And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have confirmed that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama, and the fact that Hawaii issued a birth certificate for Obama in 1961 is further confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961.

      Would you like additional proof that 2+3 really equals five?

      Delete
  6. I really don't care where he was born. He is the worst POTUS ever, which is quite an accomplishment considering some of his predecessors. He is a committed Marxist that believes in an all powerful big government as the solution to all problems. He is the first truly anti-American president that hates our Constitution. He has committed numerous "high crimes and misdemeanors", including treason. He should be impeached but our congress has no guts and has abdicated it's responsibilities. Vote them all out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    2. Re: "Impeached."

      You have the right to suggest that to your congressman and senators, and they have the right to ignore you----that's because there is NO evidence of high crimes or misdemeanors.

      As for you not caring where Obama was born. Fine, but that is the subject that this blog page is all about. YOU may not care where Obama was born, but there are other people reading this site, and they do care. For example, the second Anonymous from the top claimed that a Certificate of Live Birth is not a birth certificate (it is a fancy name for a birth certificate), and "Mr Footprint" shouted "Photoshop." And the third Anonymous from the top claimed that Obama's number does not match the others of that year (which also is false.) All of these posters DO care.

      So, for their benefit, and for any rational person who may visit this site and seek to see THE FACTS. Here are some of them:

      Obama has shown the short form birth certificate from Hawaii, which is the OFFICIAL birth certificate of Hawaii, used by thousands of people to get their US passports every year, and, BTW, he showed it way back in June 2008, five months before the election). Also, he has shown his long form Hawaii BC.

      And the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent them to him, and that all the facts, repeat ALL the facts, are exactly the same, repeat, EXACTLY the same, as what they sent to him. The fact that Hawaii issued a birth certificate for Obama in 1961 (when Hawaii was not allowed by its law to issue birth certificates to children born outside of Hawaii) is also confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notice in the “Health Bureau Statistics” section of the newspapers (which ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to) and by the INS inspector who checked on Obama’s father’s status and wrote: “one child, born in Honolulu”---and by the Hawaii teacher who wrote home about Stanley having a baby.


      And there is no indication whatever that Obama’s mother even had a passport in 1961, and very very few 18-year-olds did at the time and EXTREMELY few women traveled abroad in the last few months of pregnancy. Yet birthers hope a few GULLIBLE people will just assume that both of those happened and that Obama’s birth certificate is forged and the officials of both parties are lying and the Index Data and the birth notices are forged and the INS inspector made an error in his “one child, born in Honolulu” note and the teacher who wrote home was lying. But you’d have to be terribly GULLIBLE to think that all of that happened.

      Delete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche