You should know that this information is true - unless you're a member of the Democratic Party, then these are all lies, lies, lies.
Nearly a year has passed since this article was posted, and not a particle of evidence has emerged to confirm any of it.Here's one reason: ]http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2015/02/shrimpton-gets-jail-time-for-false-report/
You birther fools never get your head out of your back side.
Obamawas not a natural born citizen. True!! End of story. Why do you demagogues try to be in denial of the truth all of the time? Obama is an imposter. There is no truth in him. Why don't you admit it?
Re: "You should know that this information is true..."Actually, no, it's not true. It's just another birther LIE.Shrimpton is LYING. He is one of MANY birther liars in the past. He is like the LIARS who said that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya---when the tape recording shows that she said that Obama was born in HAWAII, repeatedly, but the birther sites simply did not quote her and cut off the tape recordings on their sites just before she was asked where he was born (I wonder why they did it). Shrimpton is just like the other birther liars-----like the ones who forged three “Kenyan birth certificates” (One of whom was shown by a convicted felon, one of whose past crimes was forgery, and who claimed to have gotten Obama’s BC in Kenya but refused to show proof that he, the forger, had gone to Kenya). And birther sites LIED when they said that the current governor of Hawaii, Abercrombie, said that he could not find Obama’s birth certificate (he never said any such thing,. In fact, four separate Hawaii officials of the two political parties have confirmed that Obama’s BC is in the files where it is supposed to be. And that includes the former Republican governor of Hawaii, a friend of Sarah Palin’s. Even the Kapiolani Hospital has confirmed that Obama was born there---twice (birther sites did not show either of them to you). And Obama's birth in Hawaii is further confirmed by the public Index Data file and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send notices to that section of the newspaper, and it only did so for births in Hawaii).In contrast to the FACTS above, what is Shrimpton alleging?He alleges (1) that Stanley Ann was not Obama's real mother (although she treated him like a mother all her life). He also alleges (2) that somehow Obama's Kenyan father was able to smuggle a child from Kenya to Hawaii without apparently getting a US visa for the child (You know we don't allow children to be just carried into the USA without papers) He also alleges (3) that Obama’s relatives then somehow got the officials in Hawaii to issue the birth certificate in 1961---and in 1961 the Hawaii DOH was only allowed to issue a birth certificate to children born in Hawaii---that said that Obama was born in Kapiolani Hospital in Honolulu.OR, (3) the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii, including the former Republican governor, are LYING about Obama’s birth certificate today. In addition to their lies, the public Index Data file would have had to have been forged and the two separate microfilms of the Hawaii newspapers with the DOH birth notices in them would have had to have been forged (in two separate libraries). Shrimpton has claimed that three or four British prime ministers were secretly appointed by the German government and that one of them was a child molester. And yet this article tries to a few gullible people to believe Shrimpton and not the former Republican governor of Hawaii, and the Index Data and the birth notices. Shrimpton is LYING.
Re: "And yet this article tries to a few gullible people to believe Shrimpton and not the former Republican governor of Hawaii, and the Index Data and the birth notices. Shrimpton is LYING."That should read: "And yet this article tries to GET a few gullible people to believe Shrimpton and not the former Republican governor of Hawaii, and the Index Data and the birth notices. Shrimpton is LYING.
Re: "Obamawas not a natural born citizen. True!!"Answer: False!Obama really was born in Hawaii, as his birth certificate and the confirmations of the facts on it by the officials of both parties and the Index Data and the birth notices and the teacher who wrote home all show. And every child born on US soil except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born Citizen.“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.” (Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005) [Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]"Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other. “Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning."---The Wall Street Journal (http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204619004574322281597739634.html?KEYWORDS=obama+%22natural+born+citizen%22+minor+happersett)"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)More reading on the subject:http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/31/is-rubio-eligible/http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2012/02/birtherism-2012http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obamabirthbook.com/2012/04/vattel-and-natural-born-citizen/
but they didn't have laser in 1961
Neither Obama's short-form BC nor his long-form BC was printed in 1961, and neither was supposed to. Obama asked for a copy of his short-form BC in 2007, and he was sent the standard short-form BC, which is computer generated and laser printed because it is supposed to be (that is how short-form BCs work). He asked for and received his long form BC in 2001, and it also was not printed in 1961. It is a modern copy on modern security paper with the modern seal and signature of the current official attached---all because that is the way that it is supposed to be. However, in both cases the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii have repeatedly confirmed that they sent the BCs to Obama and that all the facts on the published copies are EXACTLY the same as on what they sent to him. Moreover, Obama's receiving a BC from Hawaii in 1961 is also confirmed by (1) the public Index Data file; (2) the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and ONLY the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the Hawaii newspapers, and it only did so in 1961 for births IN Hawaii). BTW, Kapiolani Hospital has now confirmed that Obama was born there---TWICE---but birther sites have not shown either of those confirmations (I wonder why not). And, BTW, birther sites lied repeatedly when they said that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya. She really said that he was born in HAWAII repeatedly, but birther sites did not quote her and cut off the tape recordings of the call on their sites just BEFORE she was asked where he was born (I wonder why they did that???).