Monday, March 25, 2013

Breaking: Starbucks CEO Calls For Boycott Of Starbucks

In a stunning development, Howard Schultz, the CEO of Starbucks, effectively joined the National Organization for Marriage's boycott against Starbucks. When asked by a stockholder that he backtrack from his full-throated support of the radical gay agenda, Schultz responded...

"It’s a free country. You can sell your shares in Starbucks and buy shares in another company. Thank you very much."

Some corporate executives respond to boycotts by either caving-in to them, hiding behind their desks until the boycott blows over or simply standing firm to their core convictions (or lack thereof) in a firm, yet polite manner.

Schultz however appears to be upping the ante and is taking the unprecedented step of dictating to his customers and stockholder that if they don't like his views, they can take their patronage elsewhere.

As the Blaze reported: "Schultz could have responded to this indictment with platitudes, or simply addressed it in the least offensive way possible. This, however, he did not do. Rather, he launched into a full-throated defense of the company’s pro-gay stance."

While many people don't support or participate in boycotts out of general principle, in this particular case, the CEO of Starbucks is making an impassioned plea... if you don't like my views, don't buy my stock or my coffee.

Out of respect, people might consider taking Schultz at his word and doing as he wishes. The number to the Starbucks Corporate office, by the way, is (800) 235-2883.

For those who are so inclined, call them and let them know that out of respect to Mr. Schultz's wishes, you will no longer be purchasing Starbucks Coffee or buying stock in the corporation.

Read The Full Story

FREE REPORT: Is Barack Obama Trying To Destroy The US Economy!

Input Your Primary Email Address Below And You'll Receive A Free Gift, Our Downloadable Report On The Cloward-Piven Strategy.

 

 

 

Privacy Policy: We respect your privacy and will not share your email address with ANYONE... PERIOD!

Mouse Over The Green Icon To The Left To Share This Story On Your Favorite Social Media Sites.

RELATED STORIES

11 comments:

  1. You are taking your yellow journalism to a new low. CEO Schultz did not "join" any boycott. He simply told shareholders "If you don't like our policy, you can sell your shares." Which is exactly what sharheolders can choose to do. There will be plenty of Starbucks shareholders and consumers left after the anti-gay folks drop out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LET"Schultz" The peter puffer have his company and his fags.I don't drink his coffee and never and i will never support gays and there way of life.These people are very sick people and so is Schultz.

      Delete
  2. I'll stick with what the Bible has to say about Sodomy & their supporters. More evidence that the USA is in total collapse (morally, spiritually & economically). We will find out on the Last Day who was right & who was wrong in the end. But then it will be too late to change your beliefs. Interesting coincidence that as the USA falls away for the Biblical Principles it was founded upon, it soon collapses.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The commenter paints with too broad a brush when he/she speaks of "anti-gay folks." Most Americans don't really care much about the nature of gay relationships. That said, words (terms) have meaning, and I fully support the concept of civil unions/legal partnerships between members of the same sex; and, further they should bestow legal rights and responsibilities on the partners that are absolutely equivalent to man-woman unions. However, “formalized” same-sex relationships should NEVER be called a “marriage”… period! The term "marriage" has its origins in religion, and it has been specifically and historically defined in the Holy Bible, the Quran, etc., and other religious documents as the solemn God-sanctioned joining together of one man and one woman. No civil government of any type has the right or the authority to re-define any religious terms; so the bottom line here is that relationships between members of the same sex cannot BE, and should, therefore, NEVER BE referred to, or designated as, a “marriage” anywhere in either civil law or in society…because THEY ARE NOT!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. BradR - I 100% agree with you. The issue here is not one of gay rights as much as it is an attack on religion. I fully support gay lifestyle and unions but marriage is a religious concept and government has forced their way into it. No proble, I have already sold my stock and will miss my veti chai latte but so be it. Get government out of marriage and this is a non-issue.

      Delete
    2. You are one sick S.O.B DUDE ALL GAY PEOPLE ARE SICK PEOPLE.

      Delete
    3. Your comment makes ABSOLUTE SENSE! I, too agree that a "Civil Union" or equivalent terminology should be used. When I was in SoCal, there were many Government Agencies that had a "Domestic Partner" provision for benefits & Pension rights of Survivorship..As an example, Germany ( never been a "Liberal" Society) has "Civil Unions" which is the governmentally sanctioned recognition of a relationship between 2 people (gender notwithstanding) If people want a "Marriage", that is a wholly RELIGIOUS activity. I believe that the "Gay" community (which by the way, notice that many of the "Gay" people don't usually seem too happy??)is merrely trying to attack established Religions, which are antithetical or even downright hostile to their lifestyle, by pushing for this definition/ terminology of their relationships as "Marriage".. all of the Legal rights they are asking for are usually addressed by a "Civil Union" or "Domestic Partnership" status.

      Delete
  4. Queers are deviants. The norm is Hetrosesexual marriage. If you deviate you are a DEVIANT?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Whether Shultz is gay or not and has his opinion is just his opinion. GOD does not have opinions He just has truth. GOD says, not me, nor is it opinion but truth, that homosexuality is just as much a sin as fornication and adultery. The bible never uses opinions. GOD just wants man to admit that whatever GOD calls sin, admit it's sin. Otherwise you call GOD a liar, which is saying He is a false witness. When you are the false witness saying homosexuality is not a sin.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The covenant of marriage is defined as one man and one woman. Don't change the definitiion. If gays wish to join in a legal union, call their union something besides Holy Matrimony or marriage.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I do enjoy a cup of Starbucks, but due to the CEO's arrogance I think I will be able to forego their brand for another. We have enough arrogant dictators in Wash. D.C..We don't need CEO's acting holier than thou with regard to differing opinions.

    ReplyDelete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche