Tuesday, December 20, 2011

New Poll: Obama Not Born In The USA

If you doubt Barack Obama was born in the United States and doubt his eligibility to serve as President of the United States, yet another poll has just confirmed that you're not alone.  Public Policy Polling (PPP), a Democratic polling company (yes, you read that right, a Democratic polling firm), just released the results of its latest poll on December 18 and some of the more shocking findings were, yet again, totally ignored and buried by the LameStream Media.

Among those results, a whopping 52% of self-identified caucus goers in Iowa said they either believe that Barack Obama was not born in the United States (31%) or said they were not sure if Obama was born in the United States (21%).  Again, the media totally ignored this bombshell and decided, instead, to report another finding of the poll, namely that Congressman Ron Paul is gaining an edge among Iowa caucus goers.

And here's another shocking revelation from the poll.  Just in case you may be thinking that only "rabid TEA Party types" doubt Obama is eligible to serve as President of the United States, the same poll found that a whopping 74% did not consider themselves to be members of the TEA Party movement and moreover, 28% described themselves as either "very liberal," "liberal," or "moderate."

While we're on the subject shocking trends possibly uncovered by the PPP poll, here are some more interesting findings, also ignored by the LameStream Media, which could indicate that Obama is doomed to be a one-term president. 

Among the poll respondents, only 55% claimed that they participated in the 2008 Republican Iowa Caucus.  32% claimed they didn't vote in the 2008 caucus and 13% actually claimed that they voted in the Democratic Caucus in Iowa in 2008.  Those findings should be very disturbing to Team Obama because they could indicate that a massive shift may be occurring across the nation. At least in Iowa, a massive ground-shift is taking place as people are either switching teams or becoming engaged for the first time.

The PPP Poll also may have discredited yet another myth that the GOP establishment and the LameStream Media have been beating like a cheap drum; namely that Republicans are mainly looking to a candidate that "can beat Barack Obama."  According to the PPP Poll only 32% of respondents listed a "candidate's ability to beat Obama" as the most important criteria in deciding which candidate to support and a clear majority (56%) claimed the candidates’ stands on the issues were the most important criteria.

Of course, the PPP Poll is not the first poll showing that large numbers of Americans still doubt Obama's eligibility.  A number of nationwide polls over the past two years have confirmed that doubt has been wide-spread for some time.  The most recent of these polls is a June 2011 Wenzel survey which indicated that even 28% of Democrats wanted Congress to investigate Obama's eligibility AFTER the publication of Obama's alleged long-form birth certificate on the Internet.

Even a CNN poll taken back in August of 2010, which was heavily weighted toward Democrats, indicated that 6 in 10 of Americans doubt Obama was born in the United States. The LameStream Media continues to ignore the questions over Obama's eligibility but the American people refuse to let the issue die and, this much is sure, it will likely be the issue that dare not speak its name in the November election.

A full report on the methodology of the poll can be found here.

Use The Buttons Below To Share This Story With Your Friends On Facebook, Twitter And Via Email.

37 comments:

  1. Michelle his wife said Obama was Kenyon born. When he weas elected president the people of Kenya rejoiced for they thought his birthplace would be a tourist attraction. Then there was silence.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Obama does not meet the U.S. Constitution requirements that the President of the U.S. must be a "natural born Citizen". A natural born Citizen is one in which both parents are Citizens of the U.S.A. Obama's birth certificate if not an issue since he has stated that his father was born in Kenya. Our Government--the Congress and the Judiciary Branch are refusing to do what that took an oath to defend...the U.S. Constitution. Challenge your Congress Representatives. Question your State voting official about Obama's eligibility. Demand that the Democrat Party leader in your state to provide proof that Obama meets the "natural born Citizen" requirement of the U.S. Constitution. This is being done in Georgia, Alabama and Arizona. Let reveal the truth about who Obama really is.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Jim Baker said...

    "Obama does not meet the U.S. Constitution requirements that the President of the U.S. must be a "natural born Citizen". A natural born Citizen is one in which both parents are Citizens of the U.S.A. Obama's birth certificate if not an issue since he has stated that his father was born in Kenya."

    And that's not all...

    Marco Rubio's parents were not U.S. citizens at time of his birth, either. And they know it. This is why the birth certificate of Marco Rubio has disappeared from the Internet.

    And that's now all...

    The same difficulty exists for Bobby Jindal and Nikki Haley...

    Now, I wonder why a person as intelligent as Ann Coulter insists that Marco Rubio is a viable candidate for President???

    But, there is more...

    There is some question as to Mitt Romney, too. His father was born in Mexico and to know if Mitt Romney's parents were American Citizens at the time of his birth is also a question and cannot be proved until he has shown his birth certificate...

    I now wonder if all these "latter day Republican candidates" are willing to be president merely because Obama has achieve it with no proof of where he was born and, more to the point, that both parents were not American citizens. But, without a believable birth certificate, not a Certificate of Live Birth that even Obama's half-sister Maya has (and she was born in Indonesia!), we do not even know for sure that Dunham was his mother!

    Now, just how screwed up is this situation we are in???

    ReplyDelete
  4. So well said, Nocrud!!!! I noticed that the repubs are prancing Jindal around with one of the candidates...forget which one....they're all the same at this point. As soon as you see one of them hanging out with a candidate, you just know, the next ineligible is on it's way.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Marc Rubio is not running for president. End of argument.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. If either parent is a member of the U.S. Military, any child born to them is a natural born citizen because of the need of the parent(s) to be stationed outside the continental U.S.

      Delete
  6. Wayne, Marco Rubio has been courted for the presidency by Hannity, Coulter, O'Rudely and a hord of others in the media. When asked about if he will run, he only says that he is busy being a Senator. This is far from saying he will not do it OR saying that he is not eligible. This is no argument, it is just the facts. Please do not try to argue the facts...

    ReplyDelete
  7. Wayne, correction...

    I said he has been courted as a candidate for president but I should have said that he has been mentioned as a possible Vice-Presidential pick by one of the people trying to be the Republican Candidate should the person become the candidate. However, the same criteria stands for the VP as for the President since he could end up being the president like LBJ after JFK. But, this also includes the Speaker of the House of Representatives since given the necessity, he/she could also be president.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This coversation is OLD STUFF....!! Either take action and remove this "liar/felon" or SHUT UP..!!

    ReplyDelete
  9. I believe anyone can serve in the line of succession, but if that person suddenly came up to ascend to President they would have to decline and be passed over.

    msbobbie
    Oklahoma

    ReplyDelete
  10. The Natural Born Citizen Clause of Our U.S. Constitution Requires that Both of the Child’s Parents Be U.S. Citizens At the Time of Birth

    http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/09/natural-born-citizen-clause-requires.html

    This "OLD STUFF" has many, many Internet pages to support the "both parents" requirement.

    Sorry, this will not go away...

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wayne......Rubio is being touted for VP by every RINO that is in/out of their closets. They all think because he's Cuban, he'd be the perfect candidate....take down 3 or 4 special interest groups at one time. BUT, the RINO's forgot the most important issue facing anyone who wishes to make a spectacle of themselves and declare their candidacy for POTUS....the Natural Born Clause of the U.S. Constitution.
    And, because of barry soetero, there are those of WTP that live just to make sure this NEVER happens to this country again!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ref:
    http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_citi.html

    "In 2008, when Arizona Senator John McCain ran for president on the Republican ticket, some theorized that because McCain was born in the Canal Zone, he was not actually qualified to be president. However, it should be noted that section 1403 was written to apply to a small group of people to whom section 1401 did not apply. McCain is a natural-born citizen under 8 USC 1401(c): "a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States and one of whom has had a residence in the United States or one of its outlying possessions, prior to the birth of such person."

    Note that this element mentions that McCain qualified because "a person born outside of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States...."

    Also note the words "...born...of parents both of whom are citizens of the United States...."

    BOTH parents are citizens...

    End of argument!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Want more proof?

    http://www.obamanotqualified.com/obama_is_not_a_natural_born_citizen_defined.htm

    ReplyDelete
  14. good frief, msbobbie....what country are you living in? Ascend to POTUS? Decline and be passed over? Are you American? What politician that you know would give up one iota of power and money, for any reason?

    ReplyDelete
  15. Please check your facts before posting this propaganda. The U.S. Constitution doesn't require both parents to be U.S. citizens for someone to be considered a natural-born citizen. It's only the mother that needs to be, but even still, the U.S. Constitution doesn't spell this out clearly. It leaves this decision to the states. I wish you all would stop being so wishy-washy. One minute you complain about too much federal government interventio, and the next minute, you want the federal government to rule on something that is under the states' control.

    Oy.......is this birther thing the best you've got? My goodness.....that and Newt, and you've got some really strong platforms! Really?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry to say that NoCrud is right. Better get out your crying towel. Even though there is nothing in the Constitution that specifically spells out what requirements are needed for a natural-born citizen, there is presidence in common law from documents over 100 yrs. old. It DOES require both parents to be citizens of this country for at least six yrs. prior to his birth. For his father not to have been a citizen of this country, Obama has dual citizenship. By that alone, he is disqualified for ever holding the job of president. Couple that with using a stolen SS#, Obama is in serious trouble.

      These questions were documented in the Georgia trial and will at some time surface before the election. The only way Obama could not be held legally responsible for this was if Congress had passed a bill four years ago that a person just born in the country could be qualified as president. The bill was never passed, Obama is just going to have to wait until it hits the fan.

      Delete
  16. So what? This has been an issue for over a year. Either we are not able do anything about it or no one really cares. If we can't do anything about it why waste time re-hashing the same issue over and over. It's obvious it doesn't matter where obama was born, he is above the law, and if you can't accept that your a racist and you opinion is moot.

    ReplyDelete
  17. So, just forget about it? That's what got us the fraud in the White House.

    No, we're not going to shut up about this...

    There are many, many webpages that prove that two parents (both) have to be citizens when the person is born in the USA to be a Natural Born Citizen. Judges have defined it, PHD's in Law, professors have defined it. Here is just one site:

    http://www.obamanotqualified.com/obama_is_not_a_natural_born_citizen_defined.htm

    For someone to come along and "OPINE" that this is not an issue is just that, an opinion. Apparently those who prefer their opinion to the opinions who have the proof believe that their opinions are so much more valid, even though they use the old "they say" rationale, are carrying Obama's bucket but that bucket is empty...

    ReplyDelete
  18. Rationale of the logic is as follows: The U.S. Supreme Court in 1939 held that Elg was a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN because she was born in Brooklyn, New York on October 2, 1907, her father was naturalized as a U.S. citizen in 1906 under the Naturalization Act of 1906, and her mother derived her US citizenship in 1907 under the Expatriation Act of 1907 (federal statute) as proof, and being that, Elg was born prior to the 19th Amendment, ratified on August 18, 1920, her status was still tied to that of her husband.

    Ms. Elg was found to be a "natural born citizen" because she was born in the mainland USA (New York) of TWO US citizen parents. (plural)

    http://www.obamanotqualified.com/obama_is_not_a_natural_born_citizen_defined.htm

    You call this "propaganda"??? Now, that's a stretch. Accept the facts and hide your face in shame if you voted for Obama...

    ReplyDelete
  19. Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168
    'At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country, of parents (plural) who were its citizens (plural), became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further, and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction, without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case, it is not necessary to solve these doubts. It is sufficient, for everything we have now to consider, that all children, born of citizen parents (plural), within the jurisdiction, are themselves citizens.' "Minor v. Happersett (1874) 21 Wall. 162, 166-168.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Obama is a citizen because of the 14th Amendment, right? NO that is a MYTH;

    The 14th Amendment; it does not address the "natural born citizen" issue, only citizenship. The 14th Amendment (Amendment XIV) to the United States Constitution was proposed on June 13, 1866, and ratified on July 9, 1868, and was first intended to secure the rights of former slaves and it is one of the post-Civil War Reconstruction Amendments.

    The 14th amendment provides a broader definition of citizenship, overruling Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857) which had excluded slaves and their descendants from possessing Constitutional rights.

    [14th amendment] Section 1. "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

    This defines Native Born Citizen, not Natural Born Citizen. Unless one knows the difference, he/she is hard put to argue the point.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I am sooooooooooo tired of hearing/reading about this exhausted topic ... as if no one has anything better or constructive to do.

    ReplyDelete
  22. ... and I agree with the poster who identified this as propaganda. That is all it is, designed to stir up emotions and divert attention from the real issues, and the real obstacles to solutions.

    ReplyDelete
  23. And to the poster who claimed Mrs. Obama said her husband was Kenyan born: your claim is totally unfounded.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Baker, and NoCrud are both absolutely CORRECT. (Thank you for all the references and links, NoCrud!) And there are people in SEVERAL states that are challenging obama's eligibility to get placed on the 2012 ballot, as I type this.

    I've been following this issue since the very beginning, BEFORE the 2008 election, which has turned out to be so riddled with FRAUD, that it makes your head spin!

    ReplyDelete
  25. I didn't hear Mrs. Obama say that her husband was born in Kenya, but I did hear Kenyan ambassador state that with tremendous pride. He also said that people were already making pilgrimage to the place of his birth. For some reason I trust this guy more than I trust Obama.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There is a video on Utube that did have MOOOOOCHELLE say her husband was born in Kenya, but Obama has a video that he makes the same claim.

      If you are getting so tired of people talking about this, then quit trying to dominate the web site with your little tyrates. We talk about it because we have seen and heard the truth of the matter and no one will do anything about it. They fear being called a racists or what ever reprisals the Dims cook up for them.

      Delete
  26. Anonimous friend who placed his comment at the same time as I did, is quite correct. I have also been following this from the very begining, and I must sat that it didn't start last year. It started even before the 2008 election, and the one who started it was a DEMOCRAT, a lawyer who previously had been on Hillary Clinton's campaign. So she knew the truth too but sold out for a Sec. of State position.

    ReplyDelete
  27. I knew all of this way before he got close to Our White House and nobody would listen and now we are paying and paying big time and from what I am seeing there not a thing we can do because he and everyone else is using the black card even though his skin is black but the blood running through his veins is white but in this case people are judging by his cover and not what he really is from Kenya but a citizen of Indonesia.

    ReplyDelete
  28. "Although the 'citizenship by birth' rules have been complex, the February 2001 Child Citizenship Act (CCA) simplified the process. Now, a child who is under the age of 18, was born outside the U.S., and has at least one U.S. citizen parent automatically acquires U.S. citizenship upon entry into the country as an immigrant. No further paperwork is necessary." -- LegalZoom.com

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A "natural-born citizen" is a different category than just "citizen". A "natural-born citizen" is someone who is born to TWO citizen parents.
      One of B.O.'s parents was not a U.S. citizen.

      Delete
  29. I DONT GIVE A RATS ASS WHERE THIS COMMIE WAS BORN HE IS NOT AN AMERICAN.... HE IS A MUSLIM COMMUNIST,SOCIALIST ,MARXIST NAZI , COMMUNITY ORGANISING ACORN LOVING AMERICAN HATING HITLER WANABE .....FUCK YOU OCOMMIE

    ReplyDelete
  30. Someone above posted: "Although the 'citizenship by birth' rules have been complex, the February 2001 Child Citizenship Act (CCA) simplified the process. Now, a child who is under the age of 18, was born outside the U.S., and has at least one U.S. citizen parent automatically acquires U.S. citizenship upon entry into the country as an immigrant. No further paperwork is necessary."

    Um... NO. We're not talking about "US citizenship", you uninformed lib! We're talking about NATURAL BORN citizenship, which is like a sub-set of just "citizenship". BOTH PARENTS must be US citizens AT OR BEFORE the time of birth for their child(ren) to be "natural born". You have to look back to the law in place at the time of a person's birth, and NO the revised laws are NOT retroactive. Liberals can't seem to wrap their uneducated heads around this VERY SIMPLE and DISTINCT difference in citizen status. They'd rather watch the Constitution get shredded to pieces. Fine... you want to change the requirements or definition of this phrase? Then FOLLOW the procedure set forth in the Constitution to change it with an AMENDEDMENT. But I'll save you that research... There have been (since 2004) no less than EIGHT different attempts at changing this one requirement for POTUS by way of resolutions or legislation to try and redefine the meaning of "natural born citizen". All of these attempts have failed, and to this date, this requirement (and it's meaning) has remained UNCHANGED.

    ReplyDelete
  31. DIDN'T REALIZE THERE WERE SO MANY CRAZY IDIOTS IN THE WORLD,,,Oh, I forgot, this is not the 'world'; it is the INTERNET, which is really NOWHERE, JUST 'out there' where the crazies live.

    ReplyDelete
  32. while obama relaxes in comfort spending my hard
    earned tax monies - his minions are trying to
    confuse the average voter. NO HE IS NOT AN
    NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, NO MATTER HOW MUCH TIME AND MONEY oBABA SPENT HIDING HIS PAST!

    Your children and mine, and our grandchildren will reap the sorrows that this fake president
    has wrought upon them. They will be disallowed
    free speech (it may not contain anything that this president doesn't like. They will be denied
    medical care if OBAMA chooses, they will be
    denied the right to store food. This man is a
    truly frightening personl

    ReplyDelete
  33. The only proof you need to know that Obama is ineligible for the Presidency is this video, which is sourced by the Library of Congress!

    The American People WAKE UP after the Library of Congress proves Obama NOT to be a US Citizen: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dbtOoX3exk

    ReplyDelete

Posted By: Chris Carmouche